P.E.R.C. No. 2000-44, Burlington Cty
NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2000-44, issued November 29, 1999: unfair practice charge, Burlington Cty. The Merit System Board and the Chair of the Public Employment Relations Commission have issued a joint order consolidating an MSB appeal and a PERC unfair practi
PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions
A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.
- Decision
- P.E.R.C. No. 2000-44
- Issued
- November 29, 1999
- Employer, as PERC printed it
- Burlington Cty
- Docket
- CO-H-99-10
- Kind of decision
- Unfair practice charge
- Reported at
- 26 NJPER 46 (¶31015 1999)
Synopsis
As PERC published it.
The Merit System Board and the Chair of the Public Employment Relations Commission have issued a joint order consolidating an MSB appeal and a PERC unfair practice charge for hearing before an Administrative Law Judge and declaring that the Merit System Board has the predominant interest. After the ALJ issues a recommended decision, the Merit System Board will review the record to determine whether the employees' suspension was for legitimate disciplinary reasons and was warranted under Merit System law. The Commission will then determine whether the Employer-Employee Relations Act was violated. This synopsis is not part of the joint order. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commission or the Merit System Board.
The decision
The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE MERIT SYSTEM BOARD AND PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of : : COLLEEN FOX, : JOINT ORDER : ON CONSOLIDATION AND Appellant, : PREDOMINANT INTEREST : -and- : OAL Docket No. CSV 8122-98S : BURLINGTON COUNTY, : : Respondent. : : : BURLINGTON COUNTY, : : Respondent, : : -and- : PERC Docket No. CO-H-99-10 : COLLEEN FOX, : : Charging Party. : ¶
AppearancesAppearances: ¶
For the Appellant-Charging Party, Calvin W. Money, CWA Representative ¶
For the Respondent, Daniel Hornickel, attorney ¶
(Burlington County Solicitor) ¶
JOINT DECISION ¶
Colleen Fox, a Head Nurse with Buttonwood Hospital, Burlington County was suspended for six days on charges of incompetency, inefficiency or failure to perform duties; inability to perform duties; conduct unbecoming a public employee; and neglect of duty. The incident giving rise to the charges stemmed from the elopement of a patient from the Psychiatric Unit at the hospital. Fox appealed the matter to the Merit System Board who transmitted the matter to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for determination as a contested case. ¶
In addition, Fox filed an unfair practice charge with the Public Employment Relations Commission. The charge alleges that Fox was suspended due to her union activities. ¶
On October 20, 1999, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Solomon A. Metzger signed a Consent Order where the parties agreed that the Board would have "exclusive jurisdiction over the matters." ¶
Having independently evaluated the record and considered the ALJ's Order, the Board, at its meeting on November 23, 1999 and the Chair of the Public Employment Relations Commission, acting pursuant to authority delegated to her by the full Commission, on November 29, 1999 made the following determination in the matter. ¶
JOINT ORDER ¶
Based on the Consent Order and a review of the record by both the Merit System Board and the Public Employment Relations Commission, it is ordered that the matter be disposed of in the following manner. ¶
The above matters are consolidated for hearing before an ALJ. The Merit System Board has the predominant interest but not exclusive jurisdiction in the matter. The ALJ will first recommend findings of fact and conclusions of law to both the Merit System Board and the Public Employment Relations Commission, disposing of all issues in controversy through a single initial decision under N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.3 and consistent with N.J.A.C. 1:1-17.8(a); and ¶
Upon transmittal of the initial decision to both agencies, the underlying record will be forwarded to the Merit System Board to determine whether Fox's suspension was for legitimate disciplinary reasons and was otherwise warranted under Merit System law; and ¶
The Merit System Board's decision and the complete record will then be sent to the Public Employment Relations Commission to determine whether the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act was violated. ¶
DECISION RENDERED BY THE DECISION RENDERED BY THE ¶
MERIT SYSTEM BOARD ON CHAIR OF THE PUBLIC ¶
NOVEMBER 23, 1999 EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ¶
COMMISSION ON NOVEMBER 29, ¶
1999 ¶
Janice Mitchell Mintz Millicent A. Wasell ¶
Commissioner Chair ¶
Department of Personnel Public Employment Relations ¶
Commission ¶
DATED: Trenton, New Jersey DATED: Trenton, New Jersey ¶
November 23, 1999 November 29, 1999 ¶
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.
The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.