NJ Civil Service Navigator

P.E.R.C. No. 2000-65, Orange Tp

NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2000-65, issued February 10, 2000: unfair practice charge, Orange Tp. The Chair of the Public Employment Relations Commission, in a joint order with the Merit System Board, finds that an unfair practice charge filed by the City of Orang

PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions

A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.

Decision
P.E.R.C. No. 2000-65
Issued
February 10, 2000
Employer, as PERC printed it
Orange Tp
Docket
CO-H-99-39
Kind of decision
Unfair practice charge
Reported at
26 NJPER 114 (¶31047 2000)

Synopsis

As PERC published it.

The Chair of the Public Employment Relations Commission, in a joint order with the Merit System Board, finds that an unfair practice charge filed by the City of Orange Fire Officers Association, Local 210 against the City of Orange Township should be consolidated with a layoff/demotion appeal to the Merit System Board filed by the Association on behalf of four officers. The Administrative Law Judge will first offer recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law to both the Commission and Merit System Board, disposing of all issues in controversy through a single initial decision. Upon transmittal of the initial decision to both agencies, the Commission will review the matter and the record will then be forwarded to the Merit System Board for review. Where appropriate, the matter will be returned to the Commission for its consideration of whether specialized relief is warranted under its Act.

Civil service rules it cites

It also cites N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1, which this site does not reproduce, so it is not linked.

The decision

The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.

CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY MERIT SYSTEM BOARD AND PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of CITY OF ORANGE TOWNSHIP - OAL DKT. NO. CSV 3113-99 FIRE DEPARTMENT LAYOFF, AGENCY DKT NO. 1999-00598 CITY OF ORANGE FIRE OFFICERS, LOCAL 210, Charging Party, -and- PERC DKT. NO. CO-H-99-39 TOWNSHIP OF ORANGE, Respondent.

AppearancesAppearances:

For the Appellants, Fox & Fox, attorneys

(Stacey B. Rosenberg, of counsel)

For the Charging Party, John D. Feeley, President

For the Respondent, McCormack & Matthews, attorneys

(Thomas M. McCormack, of counsel)

JOINT DECISION

On June 23, 1998, the City of Orange Fire Officers Association, Local 210 filed an appeal to the Merit System Board on behalf of Local 210, Deputy Chiefs James Fonzino and Charles Messina and Captains Frank DeAngelis and Guy DeVincentis. The appellants allege that the City of Orange Township's layoff/demotion actions affecting these employees were in bad faith; in violation of the Civil Service Act, N.J.S.A. 11A:1-1 et seq .; and did not follow required pre-layoff actions including negotiations and discussions with Local 210 or the appellants to explore the possibility of cost-saving initiatives as well as alternatives to layoff. The appeal was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law as a contested case.

On August 10, 1998, Local 210 filed an unfair practice charge against the City of Orange Township. The charge alleges that the demotions were an attempt to influence the union's position in interest arbitration and were intended to chill negotiations in violation of the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1 et seq.

On April 26, 1999, the City filed a motion for consolidation. It argued that both actions arise from the City's layoff plan and involve the City's motivation for that plan.

On May 18, 1999, Local 210 and Captains Fonzino and Messina filed certifications opposing consolidation.

On January 4, 2000, Administrative Law Judge Ken R. Springer issued an Order of Consolidation and Predominant Interest. He found that both agencies have subject matter jurisdiction over the claim that the City acted in bad faith, the sole issue in dispute is whether the City acted in good faith, both the individual employees and the union share a common interest in ensuring that firefighters are treated fairly and are not victims of anti-union animus, both agencies have broad remedial authority, and both appeals are inextricably intertwined and incapable of separation. The Judge ordered that the cases be consolidated and that the Board be found to have the predominant interest.

Having independently evaluated the record and considered the Administrative Law Judge's order, the Merit System Board at its meeting on February , 2000 and the Chair of the Public Employment Relations Commission, acting pursuant to authority delegated to her by the full Commission, on January 20, 2000 made the following determination in this matter.

JOINT ORDER

The above matters are consolidated for hearing before the Administrative Law Judge. The Judge will first offer recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law to both the Public Employment Relations Commission and the Merit System Board, disposing of all issues in controversy through a single initial decision under N.J.S.A. 1:1-18.3 and consistent with N.J.A.C. 1:1-17.8(a); and

Upon transmittal of the initial decision to both agencies, the underlying record will be forwarded to the Commission to determine whether protected activity was a substantial or motivating factor in the layoff/demotions; and

The Commission's decision and the complete record will then be sent to the Merit System Board which will then determine whether the layoff/demotions were for legitimate business reasons and were otherwise warranted under Merit System Law; and

Where appropriate, the matter will be returned to the Commission for its consideration of whether specialized relief is warranted under its Act.

DECISION RENDERED BY THE DECISION RENDERED BY THE CHAIR OF

MERIT SYSTEM BOARD ON THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS

FEBRUARY 10, 2000 COMMISSION ON JANUARY 20, 2000

Janice Mitchell Mintz Millicent A. Wasell

Commissioner Chair

DATED: Trenton, New Jersey DATED: Trenton, New Jersey

February 10, 2000 January 20, 2000

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.

The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.