P.E.R.C. No. 2003-45, NJ/State (Community Affairs)
NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2003-45, issued January 15, 2003: unfair practice charge, NJ/State (Community Affairs). The Chair of the Public Employment Relations Commission and the Merit System Board entered a joint order consolidating an unfair practice charge fil
PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions
A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.
- Decision
- P.E.R.C. No. 2003-45
- Issued
- January 15, 2003
- Employer, as PERC printed it
- NJ/State (Community Affairs)
- Docket
- CI-H-2002-15
- Kind of decision
- Unfair practice charge
- Reported at
- 29 NJPER 401 (¶130 2003)
Synopsis
As PERC published it.
The Chair of the Public Employment Relations Commission and the Merit System Board entered a joint order consolidating an unfair practice charge filed with the Commission and a disciplinary appeal filed with the Merit System Board. The consolidated case will be heard by an Administrative Law Judge. The Judge's Initial Decision and the record will be forwarded to the Commission first to determine whether Ninal engaged in activity protected by the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act and whether that activity, if protected, was a substantial or motivating factor in his termination. The case will then be transferred to the Merit System Board to determine whether the termination was for legitimate business reasons and whether it was otherwise warranted under Merit System law. If necessary, the case will then be returned to the Commission for its consideration of whether specialized relief is warranted under the Act.
Issue, as PERC stated it: Deferral to arbitration; Joint Order with OAL consolidating cases
The decision
The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE MERIT SYSTEM BOARD AND PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matters of STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, JOINT ORDER ON CONSOLIDATION AND Respondent, PREDOMINANT INTEREST -and- DOP Docket No. 2002-622 OAL Docket No. CSV 9344-01 MAXIMO NINAL, Appellant. --------------------------------------- STATE OF NEW JERSEY (DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS), Respondent, -and- Docket No. CI-H-2002-15 MAXIMO NINAL, Charging Party. ¶
AppearancesAppearances: ¶
For the Respondent, David Samson, Attorney General (Karen Griffen and Melissa Resnick, Deputy Attorneys General) ¶
For the Charging Party, Robert H. Jaffee & Associates, P.A., attorneys (Robert H. Jaffe, of counsel) ¶
JOINT DECISION ¶
Maximo Ninal filed an appeal with the Merit System Board from the determination of the State of New Jersey, Department of Community Affairs to terminate his employment. Ninal also filed an unfair practice charge with the Public Employment Relations Commission. The appeal was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law and a Complaint on the unfair practice charge was issued. ¶
The respondent filed a notice of motion for Consolidation and Predominant Interest Determination. The appellant/charging party does not oppose consolidation. ¶
On November 27, 2002, Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Giordano issued a decision and order consolidating the cases before the ALJ and determining that the Board should have the predominant interest. ¶
Having independently evaluated the record and considered the ALJ's Order, the Board, at its meeting on January 15, 2003 and the Chair of the Public Employment Relations Commission, acting pursuant to authority delegated to her by the full Commission, on December 13, 2002 determined that the two cases should be consolidated and decided consistent with our approach in similar cases. See, e.g., State of New Jersey (Dept. of Treasury) , P.E.R.C. No. 2002-25, 28 NJPER 45 (¶33012 2001). ¶
JOINT ORDER ¶
The Merit System Board appeal and the Public Employment Relations Commission Complaint are consolidated for hearing before the Administrative Law Judge. The ALJ will first offer recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law to both the Public Employment Relations Commission and the Merit System Board, disposing of all issues in controversy through a single initial decision under N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.3 and consistent with N.J.A.C. 1:1-17.8(a); and ¶
Upon transmittal of the initial decision to both agencies, the underlying record will be forwarded to the Commission to determine whether Ninal engaged in activity protected under the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act and whether that activity, if protected, was a substantial or motivating factor in the termination; and ¶
The Commission's decision and the complete record will then be sent to the Merit System Board which will then determine whether the disciplinary action was for legitimate business reasons and was otherwise warranted under Civil Service laws; and ¶
If appropriate, the matter will be returned to the Commission for its consideration of whether specialized relief is warranted under its Act. ¶
DECISION RENDERED BY THE DECISION RENDERED BY THE CHAIR ¶
MERIT SYSTEM BOARD ON OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT ¶
JANUARY 15, 2003 RELATIONS COMMISSION ON ¶
DECEMBER 13, 2002 ¶
Margaret E.L. Howard Millicent A. Wasell ¶
Presiding Board Member Chair ¶
Public Employment Relations ¶
Commission ¶
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.
The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.