NJ Civil Service Navigator

P.E.R.C. No. 2004-53, Trenton

NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2004-53, issued February 27, 2004: scope of negotiations, Trenton. The Public Employment Relations Commission grants the request of the City of Trenton for a restraint of binding arbitration of a grievance filed by P.B.A. Local No. 11 (

PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions

A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.

Decision
P.E.R.C. No. 2004-53
Issued
February 27, 2004
Employer, as PERC printed it
Trenton
Docket
SN-2004-25
Kind of decision
Scope of negotiations
Reported at
30 NJPER 71 (¶24 2004)

Synopsis

As PERC published it.

The Public Employment Relations Commission grants the request of the City of Trenton for a restraint of binding arbitration of a grievance filed by P.B.A. Local No. 11 (Superior Officers Association). The grievance contests the transfer of a police lieutenant. The Commission holds that the discipline amendment authorizes agreements to arbitrate minor disciplinary disputes, but that authorization does not extend to reassignments or transfers of police officers. Police officers who believe that they have been unjustly reassigned or transferred as a form of discipline must file a Superior Court action in lieu of prerogative writ.

Issue, as PERC stated it: Police, promotion, involuntary transfer, discipline

The decision

The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.

CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of CITY OF TRENTON, Petitioner, -and- Docket No. SN-2004-25 P.B.A. LOCAL NO. 11 (SUPERIOR OFFICERS ASSOCIATION), Respondent.

SynopsisSYNOPSIS

The Public Employment Relations Commission grants the request of the City of Trenton for a restraint of binding arbitration of a grievance filed by P.B.A. Local No. 11 (Superior Officers Association). The grievance contests the transfer of a police lieutenant. The Commission holds that the discipline amendment authorizes agreements to arbitrate minor disciplinary disputes, but that authorization does not extend to reassignments or transfers of police officers. Police officers who believe that they have been unjustly reassigned or transferred as a form of discipline must file a Superior Court action in lieu of prerogative writ.

This synopsis is not part of the Commission decision. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commission.

CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of CITY OF TRENTON, Petitioner, -and- Docket No. SN-2004-25 P.B.A. LOCAL NO. 11 (SUPERIOR OFFICERS ASSOCIATION), Respondent.

AppearancesAppearances:

For the Petitioner, Laufer, Knapp, Torzewski & Dalena, LLC, attorneys (Stephen Trimboli, on the brief)

For the Respondent, Wills, O’ Neill & Mellk, attorneys (G. Robert Wills, on the brief)

DECISION

On November 12, 2003, the City of Trenton petitioned for a scope of negotiations determination. The City seeks a restraint of binding arbitration of a grievance filed by P.B.A. Local No. 11 (Superior Officers Association). The grievance contests the transfer of Lieutenant Thomas Murphy.

The parties have filed briefs and exhibits. These facts appear.

The SOA represents all police sergeants, lieutenants, captains, and deputy chiefs. The parties’ collective negotiations agreement is effective from July 1, 2000 through December 31, 2005. The grievance procedure ends in binding arbitration.

Section IV of the parties’ agreement is entitled Employee Rights. Section 4.02 covers an officer’s right to engage in political activity when not on duty and sets forth the standards that apply when an officer is being investigated.

On June 22, 2003, Thomas Murphy was transferred from the Patrol Bureau, Conditions Lieutenant, to the Services Bureau, Detention Lieutenant. An SOA grievance alleged that the transfer was made without charges or a hearing and without just cause in violation of section 4.02. The grievance also stated that the transfer or reassignment is the fifth level of discipline followed by suspension without pay, loss of promotional opportunity, demotion, and discharge from employment.

The employer denied the grievance, the SOA demanded arbitration, and this petition ensued. 1/

We today decided this issue i n another scope of negotiations petition involving these same parties. City of Trenton, P.E.R.C. No. 2004-52, 30 NJPER __ (¶2004). As we stated there, police officers who believe that they have been unjustly reassigned or transferred as a form of discipline must file a Superior Court action in lieu of prerogative writ. We grant the City’s request for a restraint of binding arbitration over the contention that the transfer was made without just cause.

OrderORDER

The request of the City of Trenton for a restraint of binding arbitration over the contention that Lieutenant Thomas Murphy was transferred without just cause is granted.

BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION

Lawrence Henderson

Chairman

Chairman Henderson, Commissioners Buchanan, DiNardo and Mastriani voted in favor of this decision. None opposed. Commissioner Sandman abstained from consideration. Commissioner Katz was not present.

DATED: February 26, 2004

Trenton, New Jersey

ISSUED: February 27, 2004

Note1/ Neither party addresses the procedural claims raised in the grievance and demand for arbitration.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.

The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.