P.E.R.C. No. 2006-25, Woodbury B/E
NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2006-25, issued October 27, 2005: contested transfer, Woodbury B/E. The Public Employment Relations Commission dismisses a petition for contested transfer determination filed by Gloria Holmes. The petition alleges that Holmes was transf
PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions
A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.
- Decision
- P.E.R.C. No. 2006-25
- Issued
- October 27, 2005
- Employer, as PERC printed it
- Woodbury B/E
- Docket
- TI-2004-003
- Kind of decision
- Contested transfer
- Reported at
- 31 NJPER 325 (¶129 2005)
Synopsis
As PERC published it.
The Public Employment Relations Commission dismisses a petition for contested transfer determination filed by Gloria Holmes. The petition alleges that Holmes was transferred between work sites for disciplinary reasons in violation of N.J.S.A. 34:13A-25. The petitioner has since retired and is now collecting a pension. The Commission concludes that the petition is moot since the remedy in contested transfer matters is to return the employee to the former work site.
Issue, as PERC stated it: Investigation and complaint, comlaint, contents, mootness
It also cites N.J.S.A. 34:13A-25, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-23, which this site does not reproduce, so they are not linked.
The decision
The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of WOODBURY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent, -and- Docket No. TI-2004-003 GLORIA HOLMES, Petitioner. ¶
SynopsisSYNOPSIS ¶
The Public Employment Relations Commission dismisses a petition for contested transfer determination filed by Gloria Holmes. The petition alleges that Holmes was transferred between work sites for disciplinary reasons in violation of N.J.S.A . 34:13A-25. The petitioner has since retired and is now collecting a pension. The Commission concludes that the petition is moot since the remedy in contested transfer matters is to return the employee to the former work site. ¶
This synopsis is not part of the Commission decision. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commission. ¶
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of WOODBURY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent, -and- Docket No. TI-2004-003 GLORIA HOLMES, Petitioner. ¶
AppearancesAppearances: ¶
For the Respondent, Campo & Campo, attorneys (Thomas G. Campo, of counsel) ¶
For the Petitioner, Zeller & Bryant, attorneys (Matthew B. Wieliczko, of counsel) ¶
DECISION ¶
On August 19, 2005, the Woodbury Board of Education moved to dismiss a contested transfer petition filed by Gloria Holmes. The petition alleges that Holmes was transferred between work sites for disciplinary reasons in violation of N.J.S.A. 34:13A- 25. ¶
The motion and accompanying certification allege that pursuant to a settlement agreement of a matter before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Holmes agreed to dismiss this petition. The motion and certification further allege that Holmes has retired and is now collecting a pension. Holmes opposes dismissal on the ground that the Board has not fully complied with the terms of the settlement agreement. She does not dispute that she has retired. ¶
N.J.S.A . 34:13A-23 prohibits the transfer of school board employees between work sites for disciplinary reasons. The remedy in such cases is to return the employee to the former work site. Since Holmes has retired from the Woodbury school system, the petition is moot. See Sparta Bd. of Ed., P.E.R.C. No. 2004-38, 29 NJPER 547 (¶176 2003) (petition moot where teacher had already returned to former work site). Any claim that the Board has not fully complied with the parties’ settlement agreement must be pursued in another forum. ¶
OrderORDER ¶
The petition is dismissed. ¶
BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION ¶
Lawrence Henderson ¶
Chairman ¶
Chairman Henderson, Commissioners Buchanan, DiNardo, Fuller and Watkins voted in favor of this decision. None opposed. Commissioner Katz was not present. ¶
DATED: October 27, 2005 ¶
Trenton, New Jersey ¶
ISSUED: October 27, 2005 ¶
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.
The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.