P.E.R.C. No. 2007-20, Carteret Boro B/E
NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2007-20, issued September 28, 2006: contested transfer, Carteret Boro B/E. The Public Employment Relations Commission dismisses a petition for contested transfer determination filed by the Carteret Education Association. The Association
PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions
A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.
- Decision
- P.E.R.C. No. 2007-20
- Issued
- September 28, 2006
- Employer, as PERC printed it
- Carteret Boro B/E
- Docket
- TO-2006-002
- Kind of decision
- Contested transfer
- Reported at
- 32 NJPER 331 (¶137 2006)
Synopsis
As PERC published it.
The Public Employment Relations Commission dismisses a petition for contested transfer determination filed by the Carteret Education Association. The Association alleges that the Carteret Borough Board of Education transferred a maintenance employee from the day shift to an afternoon/evening shift as discipline for allegedly harassing a teacher. N.J.S.A. 34:13A-25 prohibits transfers of school board employees between work sites for disciplinary reasons. The Commission holds that this case involves a change of shifts, not a transfer between work sites. This synopsis is not part of the Commission decision. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commission.
Issue, as PERC stated it: Promotion/demotion/transfer/discipline, transfer, involuntary; Procedures
It also cites N.J.S.A. 34:13A-25, N.J.A.C. 19:18-2.2(b), which this site does not reproduce, so they are not linked.
The decision
The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of CARTERET BOROUGH BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent, -and- Docket No. TO-2006-002 CARTERET EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Petitioner. ¶
SynopsisSYNOPSIS ¶
The Public Employment Relations Commission dismisses a petition for contested transfer determination filed by the Carteret Education Association. The Association alleges that the Carteret Borough Board of Education transferred a maintenance employee from the day shift to an afternoon/evening shift as discipline for allegedly harassing a teacher. N.J.S.A . 34:13A-25 prohibits transfers of school board employees between work sites for disciplinary reasons. The Commission holds that this case involves a change of shifts, not a transfer between work sites. ¶
This synopsis is not part of the Commission decision. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commission. ¶
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of CARTERET BOROUGH BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent, -and- Docket No. TO-2006-002 CARTERET EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Petitioner. ¶
AppearancesAppearances: ¶
For the Respondent, Wilentz Goldman & Spitzer P.A., attorneys (Elizabeth Farley Murphy, of counsel) ¶
For the Petitioner, Stephen E. Klausner, Esq., LLC, attorney ¶
DECISION ¶
On March 6, 2006, the Carteret Education Association filed a petition for contested transfer determination. The Association alleges that the Carteret Borough Board of Education transferred a maintenance employee from the day shift to an afternoon/evening shift as discipline for allegedly harassing a teacher. The petition does not specify the employee’s work sites before and after the transfer, as required by N.J.A.C . 19:18-2.2(b)5. ¶
On July 11, 2006, the Board filed a motion to dismiss. It argues that a transfer to a different shift is not a disciplinary transfer between work sites in violation of N.J.S.A. 34:13A-25. The Association has not responded to the motion. ¶
N.J.S.A . 34:13A-25 prohibits transfers of school board employees between work sites for disciplinary reasons. In Mt. Arlington Bd. of Ed., P.E.R.C. No. 98-4, 23 NJPER 450 (¶28211 1997), we explained that by using the term “work sites,” the Legislature intended to prohibit disciplinary transfers between buildings. ¶
In this case, the maintenance employee has certified that: ¶
[a]ll maintenance workers are assigned to the building that houses the Administrative Office of the District. We are then assigned by the Director of Building and Grounds to any district owned properties to repair or maintain objects that may need to be repaired or replaced. ¶
This case involves a change of shifts, not a transfer between work sites. Accordingly, this petition must be dismissed. ¶
OrderORDER ¶
The contested transfer petition is dismissed. ¶
BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION ¶
Chairman Henderson, Commissioners DiNardo, Fuller, Katz and Watkins voted in favor of this decision. None opposed. Commissioner Buchanan was not present. ¶
ISSUED: September 28, 2006 ¶
Trenton, New Jersey ¶
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.
The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.