P.E.R.C. No. 2009-35, NJ/State Judiciary (Morris)
NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2009-35, issued December 17, 2008: unfair practice charge, NJ/State Judiciary (Morris). The Civil Service Commission and the Chairman of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission issue a Joint Order consolidating an appeal b
PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions
A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.
- Decision
- P.E.R.C. No. 2009-35
- Issued
- December 17, 2008
- Employer, as PERC printed it
- NJ/State Judiciary (Morris)
- Docket
- CO-2007-210
- Kind of decision
- Unfair practice charge
- Reported at
- 35 NJPER 1 (¶1 2008)
Synopsis
As PERC published it.
The Civil Service Commission and the Chairman of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission issue a Joint Order consolidating an appeal before Civil Service and an unfair practice charge before PERC for hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. The appeal and the charge both contest the employer’s suspension of Thomas Novak, an employee of the New Jersey Judiciary (Morris/Sussex Vicinage). After the ALJ issues a decision, Civil Service will make a determination within the scope of its predominant interest. The matter will then be transferred to PERC for consideration of any remaining issues within the Commission’s jurisdiction.
The decision
The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AND PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of THOMAS J. NOVAK, Appellant, OAL Dkt No. CSV 10459-06 -and- Agency Dkt No. 2007-823 NEW JERSEY STATE JUDICIARY (MORRIS/SUSSEX VICINAGE), Respondent. In the Matter of PROBATION ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY (CASE-RELATED PROFESSIONAL UNIT) Charging Party, Docket No. CO-2007-210 -and- NEW JERSEY STATE JUDICIARY (MORRIS-SUSSEX VICINAGE) Respondent. ¶
SynopsisSYNOPSIS ¶
The Civil Service Commission and the Chairman of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission issue a Joint Order consolidating an appeal before Civil Service and an unfair practice charge before PERC for hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. The appeal and the charge both contest the employer’s suspension of Thomas Novak, an employee of the New Jersey Judiciary (Morris/Sussex Vicinage). After the ALJ issues a decision, Civil Service will make a determination within the scope of its predominant interest. The matter will then be transferred to PERC for consideration of any remaining issues within the Commission’s jurisdiction. ¶
This synopsis is not part of the Commission decision. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commission. ¶
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AND PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of THOMAS J. NOVAK, Appellant, OAL Dkt No. CSV 10459-06 -and- Agency Dkt No. 2007-823 NEW JERSEY STATE JUDICIARY (MORRIS/SUSSEX VICINAGE), Respondent. In the Matter of PROBATION ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY (CASE-RELATED PROFESSIONAL UNIT) Charging Party, Docket No. CO-2007-210 -and- NEW JERSEY STATE JUDICIARY (MORRIS-SUSSEX VICINAGE) Respondent. ¶
AppearancesAppearances: ¶
For the Appellant/Charging Party, Fox & Fox, LLP (Lynsey A. Johnson, of counsel) ¶
For the Respondent, Thomas Russo, Staff Attorney, Office of Counsel to the Administrative Director of the Courts ¶
JOINT DECISION ¶
On August 24, 2006, Thomas J. Novak filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission of determinations by the New Jersey State Judiciary (Morris/Sussex Vicinage) to suspend him for five and fifteen days. On January 16, 2007, the Probation Association of New Jersey (Morris/Sussex Vicinage)( “PANJ” ) filed an unfair practice charge with the Public Employment Relations Commission alleging that Novak’s suspensions were because of his position as PANJ president and in retaliation for filing a complaint against a superior. The appeal was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law and a Complaint on the unfair practice charge issued. ¶
The respondent filed a motion for consolidation and predominant interest determination. The appellant and charging party support consolidation and a determination that the Civil Service Commission has the predominant interest in the conduct and outcome of the consolidated matter. ¶
On December 1, 2008, Administrative Law Judge Maria Mancini LaFiandra issued a decision and order consolidating the cases before the ALJ and determining that the Civil Service Commission should have the predominant interest. ¶
Having independently evaluated the record and considered the ALJ's Order, the Civil Service Commission, at its meeting on December 17, 2008 and the Chairman of the Public Employment Relations Commission, acting pursuant to authority delegated to him by the full Commission, on December 16, 2008 determined that the two cases should be consolidated and decided consistent with the procedure requested by both parties. ¶
JOINT ORDER ¶
The Civil Service appeal and the Public Employment Relations Commission Complaint are consolidated for hearing before the Administrative Law Judge. The ALJ will first offer recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law to both the Public Employment Relations Commission and the Civil Service Commission, disposing of all issues in controversy through a single initial decision under N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.3 and consistent with N.J.A.C. 1:1-17.8(a); and ¶
Upon transmittal of the initial decision to both agencies, the underlying record will be forwarded to the Civil Service Commission to consider and decide all questions within the scope of its predominant interest; and ¶
If appropriate, the matter will then be forwarded to the Public Employment Relations Commission for consideration of any remaining issues within its jurisdiction. ¶
DECISION RENDERED BY THE DECISION RENDERED BY THE CHAIRMAN ¶
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION ON OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ¶
DECEMBER 17, 2008 COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 16, 2008 ¶
Hope L. Cooper Acting Chairperson Lawrence Henderson, Chairman ¶
Civil Service Commission Public Employment Relations Commission ¶
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.
The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.