P.E.R.C. No. 2009-67, Atlantic City B/E
NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2009-67, issued May 28, 2009: scope of negotiations, Atlantic City B/E. The Public Employment Relations Commission restrains binding arbitration of a grievance filed by the Atlantic City Education Association. The grievance contests the
PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions
A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.
- Decision
- P.E.R.C. No. 2009-67
- Issued
- May 28, 2009
- Employer, as PERC printed it
- Atlantic City B/E
- Docket
- SN-2009-038
- Kind of decision
- Scope of negotiations
- Reported at
- 35 NJPER 158 (¶58 2009)
Synopsis
As PERC published it.
The Public Employment Relations Commission restrains binding arbitration of a grievance filed by the Atlantic City Education Association. The grievance contests the withholding of a teacher’s salary increment. The Commission finds that the withholding was based predominately on the evaluation of teaching performance and any challenge to the withholding must be filed with the Commissioner of Education.
It also cites N.J.S.A. 34:13A-26, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-27d, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-22, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-27a, which this site does not reproduce, so they are not linked.
The decision
The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of ATLANTIC CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Petitioner, -and- Docket No. SN-2009-038 ATLANTIC CITY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Respondent. ¶
SynopsisSYNOPSIS ¶
The Public Employment Relations Commission restrains binding arbitration of a grievance filed by the Atlantic City Education Association. The grievance contests the withholding of a teacher’s salary increment. The Commission finds that the withholding was based predominately on the evaluation of teaching performance and any challenge to the withholding must be filed with the Commissioner of Education. ¶
This synopsis is not part of the Commission decision. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commission. ¶
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of ATLANTIC CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Petitioner, -and- Docket No. SN-2009-038 ATLANTIC CITY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Respondent. ¶
AppearancesAppearances: ¶
For the Petitioner, Comegno Law Group, P.C., attorneys (Kimberly A. Sukinik, of counsel) ¶
DECISION ¶
On January 2, 2009, the Atlantic City Board of Education petitioned for a scope of negotiations determination. The Board seeks a restraint of binding arbitration of a grievance filed by the Atlantic City Education Association. The grievance claims that a teacher’s increment was withheld without just cause. We restrain arbitration because the withholding was based predominately on an evaluation of teaching performance. ¶
The Board has filed a brief and certification. The Association has not opposed the petition, but has not withdrawn the grievance. These facts appear. ¶
On November 19, 2007, a principal conducted a classroom observation and then issued an observation report. In the area of Curriculum and Evaluation, the teacher received unsatisfactory ratings in: ¶
Plans lessons to accomplish specific objectives in accordance with the adopted curriculum; ¶
Demonstrates adequate knowledge of subject matter; ¶
Utilizes appropriate and varied teaching techniques; ¶
Demonstrates the knowledge and skills to make effective decisions regarding independent work, cooperative work and student practice; and ¶
Utilizes appropriate and varied instructional materials. ¶
The principal states that on June 9, 2008, the Board withheld the teacher’s increment for reasons directly related to the teacher’s alleged poor teaching performance, as the principal observed and documented. ¶
Under N.J.S.A. 34:13A-26 et seq., all increment withholdings of teaching staff members may be submitted to binding arbitration except those based predominately on the evaluation of teaching performance. Edison Tp. Bd. of Ed. v. Edison Tp. Principals and Supervisors Ass’n, 304 N.J. Super. 459 (App. Div. 1997), aff’ g P.E.R.C. No. 97-40, 22 NJPER 390 (¶27211 1996). Under N.J.S.A. 34:13A-27d, if the reason for a withholding is related predominately to the evaluation of teaching performance, any appeal shall be filed with the Commissioner of Education. ¶
If there is a dispute over whether the reason for a withholding is predominately disciplinary, as defined by N.J.S.A. 34:13A-22, or related predominately to the evaluation of teaching performance, we must make that determination. N.J.S.A. 34:13A- 27a. Our power is limited to determining the appropriate forum for resolving a withholding dispute. We do not and cannot consider whether a withholding was with or without just cause. ¶
The stated reasons for this withholding relate predominately to an evaluation of teaching performance. Accordingly, we restrain binding arbitration. Any review of the withholding must be before the Commissioner of Education. ¶
OrderORDER ¶
The request of the Atlantic City Board of Education for a restraint of binding arbitration is granted. ¶
BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION ¶
Chairman Henderson, Commissioners Branigan, Buchanan, Colligan, Fuller and Joanis voted in favor of this decision. None opposed. Commissioner Watkins was not present. ¶
ISSUED: May 28, 2009 ¶
Trenton, New Jersey ¶
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.
The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.