P.E.R.C. No. 2010-32, Atlantic Cty
NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2010-32, issued November 5, 2009: unfair practice charge, Atlantic Cty. The Civil Service Commission and the Chairman of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission issue a Joint Order consolidating appeals before Civil Servic
PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions
A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.
- Decision
- P.E.R.C. No. 2010-32
- Issued
- November 5, 2009
- Employer, as PERC printed it
- Atlantic Cty
- Docket
- CO-2009-323
- Kind of decision
- Unfair practice charge
- Reported at
- 35 NJPER 427 (¶138 2009)
Synopsis
As PERC published it.
The Civil Service Commission and the Chairman of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission issue a Joint Order consolidating appeals before Civil Service and an unfair practice charge before PERC for hearing before a PERC Hearing Examiner designated as a Special Administrative Law Judge. The charge alleges that two County correction officers were denied union representation after they were arrested and advised to resign by County representatives while in police custody. The appeal seeks to rescind the officers’ resignations on the basis that they were the result of duress or coercion. After the ALJ issues a decision to both agencies, PERC will determine whether the County committed an unfair practice; the CSC will then determine whether the resignation was the result of duress or coercion or was otherwise valid under Civil Service law.
Civil service rules it cites
It also cites N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1, which this site does not reproduce, so it is not linked.
The decision
The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AND PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of ATLANTIC COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent, -and- Agency Docket No. CSV 8377-09 OAL Docket No. 2009-3217 CHRISTOPHER M. CARTY, Appellant. COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, Respondent, -and- Docket No. CO-2009-323 FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE No. 34, Charging Party. ¶
SynopsisSYNOPSIS ¶
The Civil Service Commission and the Chairman of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission issue a Joint Order consolidating appeals before Civil Service and an unfair practice charge before PERC for hearing before a PERC Hearing Examiner designated as a Special Administrative Law Judge. The charge alleges that two County correction officers were denied union representation after they were arrested and advised to resign by County representatives while in police custody. The appeal seeks to rescind the officers’ resignations on the basis that they were the result of duress or coercion. After the ALJ issues a decision to both agencies, PERC will determine whether the County committed an unfair practice; the CSC will then determine whether the resignation was the result of duress or coercion or was otherwise valid under Civil Service law. ¶
This synopsis is not part of the Commission decision. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commission. ¶
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AND PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of ATLANTIC COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondent, -and- Agency Docket No. CSV 8377-09 OAL Docket No. 2009-3217 CHRISTOPHER M. CARTY, Appellant. COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, Respondent, -and- Docket No. CO-2009-323 FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGE No. 34, Charging Party. ¶
AppearancesAppearances: ¶
For the Respondent, Eric M. Bernstein & Associates, L.L.C. (Deborah J. Bracaglia, of counsel) ¶
For the Appellant/Charging Party, Selikoff & Cohen, P.A. (Keith Waldman, of counsel) ¶
DECISION ¶
On March 17, 2009, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 34 filed an unfair practice charge with the Public Employment Relations Commission against the County of Atlantic. The charge alleges that the employer violated the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1 et seq., when County Correction Officers Christopher M. Carty and Robert Roeder requested and were denied union representation after they were arrested by the Winslow Township Police Department and charged with various offenses. Carty and Roeder submitted letters of resignation to Atlantic County officials while in the custody of the Winslow Township police. The FOP further alleges that the County refused to provide information upon its request in relation to the resignations of Carty and Roeder. ¶
Carty and Roeder sought to rescind their resignations and the County refused. They filed appeals to the Civil Service Commission pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-6.1(d), asserting that their resignations were the result of duress or coercion. On July 8, 2009, the Civil Service Commission dismissed Roeder’s appeal as moot. It transmitted Carty’s case to the Office of Administrative Law for a hearing as a contested case. ¶
The parties have filed cross-motions for consolidation and for a determination as to predominant interest. The parties agree that the Civil Service Commission and the Public Employment Relations Commission matters should be consolidated. The FOP and Carty argue that PERC has the predominant interest since the matter concerns violations of Carty and Roeder’s rights under its Act. The County counters that the CSC has the predominant interest because the case focuses on issues of coercion and duress. ¶
On September 24, 2009, Administrative Law Judge Bruce M. Gorman issued an Order consolidating these matters and directing that the Public Employment Relations Commission has the predominant interest. ¶
Having independently evaluated the record and considered the Administrative Law Judge’s order, the Civil Service Commission at its meeting on November 5, 2009 and the Chairman of the Public Employment Relations Commission, acting pursuant to authority delegated to him by the full Commission, on October 26, 2009 determined that the two cases should be consolidated and decided consistent with the following Joint Order.JOINT ORDER The Civil Service appeal and the unfair practice Complaint are consolidated for hearing before a Hearing Examiner of the Public Employment Relations Commission designated as a Special Administrative Law Judge. The ALJ will first offer recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law to both the Public Employment Relations Commission and the Civil Service Commission, disposing of all issues in controversy through a single initial decision under N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.3 and consistent with N.J.A.C. 1:1-17.8(a); and ¶
Upon transmittal of the initial decision to both agencies, the underlying record will be forwarded to the Public Employment Relations Commission to consider and decide all questions within its unfair practice jurisdiction; and ¶
The Public Employment Relations Commission’s decision and the complete record will then be sent to the Civil Service Commission to determine whether Carty’s resignation was the result of duress or coercion or was otherwise valid under Civil Service laws. ¶
DECISION RENDERED BY THE DECISION RENDERED BY THE CHAIRMAN ¶
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ¶
ON November 5, 2009 COMMISSION ON October 26, 2009 ¶
Margaret E.L. Howard, Lawrence Henderson, Chairman ¶
Presiding Member Public Employment Relations ¶
Civil Service Commission Commission ¶
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.
The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.