P.E.R.C. No. 2012-28, NJ/State (Ancora Psy Hosp)
NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2012-28, issued December 7, 2011: unfair practice charge, NJ/State (Ancora Psy Hosp). The Chair of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission and the Chair of the Civil Service Commission issue a joint order consolidating an
PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions
A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.
- Decision
- P.E.R.C. No. 2012-28
- Issued
- December 7, 2011
- Employer, as PERC printed it
- NJ/State (Ancora Psy Hosp)
- Docket
- CO-2011-221
- Kind of decision
- Unfair practice charge
- Reported at
- 38 NJPER 251 (¶84 2012)
Synopsis
As PERC published it.
The Chair of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission and the Chair of the Civil Service Commission issue a joint order consolidating an appeal before Civil Service and an unfair practice charge before PERC for hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. The appeal and the charge both allege that a union president was suspended in retaliation for protected activity. After the ALJ issues a decision to both agencies, PERC will determine whether the employee engaged in activity protected under the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1 et seq., and whether the activity, if protected was a substantial or motivating factor in the suspension; the CSC will then determine whether the disciplinary action was for a legitimate business reason and was otherwise warranted under the Civil Service laws; and if appropriate the matter will be returned to PERC for consideration of whether specialized relief is warranted under its Act.
It also cites N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.4, which this site does not reproduce, so they are not linked.
The decision
The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AND BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matters of ROBERT RUFFIN, Appellant, -and- OAL Docket No. CSV 13378-10 Agency Docket No. 2011-1702 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, Respondent. AFSCME COUNCIL 71, LOCAL 2218, Charging Party, Docket No. CO-2011-221 -and- STATE OF NEW JERSEY ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, Respondent. ¶
SynopsisSYNOPSIS ¶
The Chair of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission and the Chair of the Civil Service Commission issue a joint order consolidating an appeal before Civil Service and an unfair practice charge before PERC for hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. The appeal and the charge both allege that a union president was suspended in retaliation for protected activity. After the ALJ issues a decision to both agencies, PERC will determine whether the employee engaged in activity protected under the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1 et seq., and whether the activity, if protected was a substantial or motivating factor in the suspension; the CSC will then determine whether the disciplinary action was for a legitimate business reason and was otherwise warranted under the Civil Service laws; and if appropriate the matter will be returned to PERC for consideration of whether specialized relief is warranted under its Act. ¶
This synopsis is not part of the Commission decision. It has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Commission. ¶
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION AND BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matters of ROBERT RUFFIN, Appellant, -and- OAL Docket No. CSV 13378-10 Agency Docket No. 2011-1702 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, Respondent. AFSCME COUNCIL 71, LOCAL 2218, Charging Party, Docket No. CO-2011-221 -and- STATE OF NEW JERSEY ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, Respondent. ¶
AppearancesAppearances: ¶
For the Respondent, Walter Miziuk, Employee Relations Officer and Paula T. Dow, Attorney General (Sally Ann Fields, Senior Deputy Attorney General, of counsel) ¶
For the Appellant/Charging Party Geoffrey B. Gompers & Associates, attorneys (Geoffrey B. Gompers, of counsel) ¶
DECISION ¶
Robert Ruffin filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission of a determination by the State of New Jersey Department of Human Services Ancora Psychiatric Hospital to suspend him for 15 days. On December 13, 2010, AFSCME Council 71 Local 2218 filed an unfair practice charge alleging that Ruffin’s suspension was in retaliation for his alleged protected activity as union president in violation of the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act. N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.4 et seq. The Civil Service appeal was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law and a Complaint on the unfair practice charge was issued. ¶
On March 31, 2011, counsel for Ruffin filed a motion for consolidation and predominant interest determination requesting the judge to order that the Office of Administrative Law has the predominant interest. The Respondent supports consolidation, but requests that a determination be made that the Civil Service Commission has the predominant interest in the conduct and outcome of the consolidated matter. ¶
On July 27, 2011, Administrative Law Judge Robert Bingham II issued a decision and order consolidating the cases and determining that since the Public Employment Relations Commission and the Civil Service Commission have concurrent unfair practice jurisdiction, the Civil Service Commission should have the predominant interest. The Public Employment Relations Commission was served with the ALJ’s Order on October 31. The Civil Service Commission was served with the Order on November 22. ¶
Having independently evaluated the record and considered the Administrative Law Judge’s Order, the Civil Service Commission, at its meeting on December 7, 2011 and the Chair of the Public Employment Relations Commission, acting pursuant to authority delegated to her by the full Commission, on November 30, 2011 made the following determination in this matter. The Civil Service Commission and the Public Employment Relations Commission do not share concurrent jurisdiction over unfair practices as defined by the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act. The Public Employment Relations Commission’s unfair practice jurisdiction is exclusive. The Public Employment Relations Commission shall have the predominant interest. The Administrative Law Judge’s Order is modified as follows: ¶
JOINT ORDER ¶
The Civil Service appeal and the Public Employment Relations Commission Complaint are consolidated for hearing before the Administrative Law Judge. The Administrative Law Judge will first offer recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law to both the Public Employment Relations Commission and the Civil Service Commission, disposing of all issues in controversy through a single initial decision under N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.3 and consistent with N.J.A.C. 1:1-17.8(a); and ¶
Upon transmittal of the initial decision to both agencies, the underlying record will be forwarded to the Public Employment Relations Commission to determine whether Ruffin engaged in activity protected under the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1 et seq., and whether that activity, if protected, was a substantial or motivating factor in the suspension; and ¶
PERC’s decision and the complete record will then be sent to the Civil Service Commission to determine whether the disciplinary action was for legitimate business reasons and was otherwise warranted under Civil Service laws; and ¶
If appropriate, the matter will be returned to the Public Employment Relations Commission for its consideration of whether specialized relief is warranted under its Act. ¶
DECISION RENDERED BY THE DECISION RENDERED BY THE CHAIR ¶
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ¶
ON DECEMBER 7, 2011 COMMISSION ON NOVEMBER 30, 2011 ¶
Robert M. Czech, Chair P. Kelly Hatfield, Chair ¶
Civil Service Commission Public Employment Relations ¶
Commission ¶
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.
The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.