P.E.R.C. No. 2013-10, NJ/State
NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2013-10, issued September 6, 2012: interest arbitration appeal, NJ/State. The Public Employment Relations Commission grants the State of New Jersey’s motion to dismiss an interest arbitration petition filed by the New Jersey Law Enforce
PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions
A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.
- Decision
- P.E.R.C. No. 2013-10
- Issued
- September 6, 2012
- Employer, as PERC printed it
- NJ/State
- Docket
- IA-2012-004
- Kind of decision
- Interest arbitration appeal
- Reported at
- 39 NJPER 100 (¶37 2012)
Synopsis
As PERC published it.
The Public Employment Relations Commission grants the State of New Jersey’s motion to dismiss an interest arbitration petition filed by the New Jersey Law Enforcement Commanders Officers Association. The Commission holds that as of October 6, 2011, the unit description listed on the interest arbitration petition included titles that no longer exist as well as omitted titles it now represents. This change was the result of a change in Civil Service titles. A new unit was certified by the Director of Representation in December 2011 after the re-organization. The Association may re-file its interest arbitration petition reflecting the titles in the unit as described in the Certification of Unit issued in December 2011.
The decision
The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.
CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Respondent, -and- Docket No. IA-2012-004 NEW JERSEY LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMANDERS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner. ¶
AppearancesAppearances: ¶
For the Respondent, Jackson Lewis, attorneys (Jeffrey J. Corradino, of counsel; James J. Gillespie, on the brief) ¶
For the Petitioner, Mario A. Iavicoli, of counsel and on the brief ¶
DECISION ¶
On March 13, 2012, the State of New Jersey filed a motion to dismiss the interest arbitration petition filed by the New Jersey Law Enforcement Commanders Association. The State asserts that the unit for which the Association seeks interest arbitration no longer exists. On April 25, the Association filed a response that the Interest Arbitration Act requires processing of the petition and some titles included in the unit description still exist.1/ On May 4, the State filed a reply. The following facts appear. ¶
Prior to October 6, 2011, the Association represented two separate negotiations units. The first unit included: Corrections Captains; Corrections Captains, Juvenile Justice; Supervising Conservation Officers; and Supervising Parole Officers. The second unit included only Directors of Custody Operations ( “DOCOs” ). ¶
On October 6, 2011, the Civil Service Commission ( “CSC” ) issued a decision approving the Department of Corrections’ request to create the title of Corrections Major to consolidate comparable functions performed by existing custody supervisory staff in the titles Corrections Captain, DOCO I, and DOCO II.2/ On November 3, Petitioner filed a Representation Petition3/ seeking to represent a new unit including: Corrections Majors; Corrections Captains, Juvenile Justice; Supervising Conservation Officers; and Supervising Parole Officers. On December 19, the Director of Representation approved the parties Stipulation of Appropriate Unit and the unit was certified by card check on December 28. The Association was certified as the exclusive representative of all regularly employed Correction Majors; Correction Captains, Juvenile Justice; Supervising Conservation Officers; and Supervising Parole Officers employed by the State of New Jersey. ¶
On October 7, 2011, after the CSC had abolished the Correction Captain and DOCO titles, the Association filed for compulsory interest arbitration for a unit with these titles: Correction Captain; Correction Captain, Juvenile Justice; Supervising Conservation Officer; and Supervising Parole Officer. The petition was held in abeyance while the parties participated in mediation. When the parties remained at impasse, the Association sought further processing of its interest arbitration petition. The State filed the instant motion to dismiss. ¶
We dismiss the petition without prejudice. As of October 6, 2011, the unit description listed on the interest arbitration petition included titles that no longer exist as well as omitted titles it now represents. Accordingly, the petition is not perfected.4/ ¶
OrderORDER ¶
The State of New Jersey’s motion to dismiss the interest arbitration petition filed by the New Jersey State Law Enforcement Commanding Officer’s Association is granted. The Association may file a new petition that accurately reflects the unit description in the certification. The petition is dismissed. ¶
BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION ¶
Chair Hatfield, Commissioners Bonanni, Boudreau, Eskilson, Jones, Voos and Wall voted in favor of this decision. None opposed. ¶
ISSUED: September 6, 2012 ¶
Trenton, New Jersey ¶
Note1/ The Association’s response was accompanied by a motion to accept the filing out of time. As the State has advised it will not oppose the late filing, we accept it. ¶
2/ The Association has appealed this decision to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, Docket No. A- ¶
3/ Docket No. RO-2012-31 ¶
4/ We note our disappointment that this matter had to be delayed by motion practice as the record indicates the State’s willingness to proceed with negotiations and the Association’s refusal to amend its petition to reflect the appropriate unit. ¶
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.
The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.