NJ Civil Service Navigator

P.E.R.C. No. 2016-90, Ewing Tp

NJ Public Employment Relations Commission decision P.E.R.C. No. 2016-90, issued April 15, 2016: unfair practice charge, Ewing Tp.

PERC decisions and contracts · Search PERC decisions

A decision of the New Jersey Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC), not of the Civil Service Commission.

Decision
P.E.R.C. No. 2016-90
Issued
April 15, 2016
Employer, as PERC printed it
Ewing Tp
Docket
CO-2015-024
Kind of decision
Unfair practice charge
Reported at
43 NJPER 123 (¶37 2016)

Civil service rules it cites

It also cites N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.4a, which this site does not reproduce, so they are not linked.

The decision

The panel is the decision as PERC issued it; labels, links and ¶ are ours.

CaptionSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION AND CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION In the Matter of ARTI SAHNI, Appellant, -and- OAL Docket No. CSV 15050-14 Agency Docket No. 2015-1296 TOWNSHIP OF EWING, Respondent. ________________________________ CWA LOCAL 1032, Charging Party, -and- PERC Docket No. CO-2015-024 TOWNSHIP OF EWING, Respondent.

AppearancesAppearances:

For the Respondent, Hill Wallack, LLC, attorneys (Rocky

Peterson, of counsel)

For the Appellant/Charging Party, Weissman & Mintz, attorneys (Jason L. Jones, of counsel)

DECISION

Appellant Arti Sahni filed an appeal with the Civil Service Commission (CSC) from a determination of the Ewing Township Department of Administration, Finance and Public Works, to terminate her employment. Communications Workers of America, Local 1032 filed an unfair practice charge with the Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC) alleging that Sahni was terminated in violation of the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-1 et seq. The CSC appeal was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for hearing and a Complaint on the unfair practice charge was issued by the PERC Director of Unfair Practices on the allegations that the employer violated N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.4a (1) and (3).1/

On October 30, 2015, the Township requested that the PERC and CSC matters be consolidated. After independently evaluating the record and considering the ALJ’s Order, the Chair of the CSC, acting pursuant to his authority under N.J.A.C. 4A:1-3.2(b)3 and the Chair of PERC, acting pursuant to the authority delegated to her by the full Commission, on January 13, 2016, determined that the two cases should be consolidated consistent with our approach in similar cases. PERC’s unfair practice jurisdiction is exclusive. PERC shall have the predominant interest and the case should be processed in accordance with the following:

JOINT ORDER

The Civil Service Commission appeal and the Public Employment Relations Commission unfair practice complaint are consolidated for hearing before the ALJ. The ALJ will first offer recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law to both PERC and the CSC disposing of all issues in controversy through a single initial decision under N.J.A.C. 1:1-17.8(a); and

Upon transmittal of the initial decision to both agencies, the underlying record will be forwarded to PERC to determine whether Sahni engaged in protected activity under the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act and whether that activity, if protected, was a substantial or motivating factor in the termination; and

PERC’s decision and the complete record will then be sent to the CSC which will then determine whether the disciplinary action was for legitimate business reasons and was otherwise warranted under the Civil Service laws; and

If appropriate, the matter will be returned to PERC for its consideration of whether specialized relief is warranted under its Act.

DECISION RENDERED BY THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION ON _______________, 2016

Robert M. Czech, Chairperson

Civil Service Commission

DECISION RENDERED BY THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION ON JANUARY 13, 2016

P. Kelly Hatfield, Chair

Public Employment Relations

Commission

Note1/ These provisions prohibit public employers, their representatives or agents from: “1) Interfering with, restraining or coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed to then by this act. . . [and] (3) Discriminating in regard to hire or tenure of employment or any term and condition of employment to encourage or discourage employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed to them by this act.”

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is PERC's document page and the PDF PERC published. The text here was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Not the Civil Service Commission. PERC is a separate state agency from the Civil Service Commission. It administers the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, which governs collective negotiations in public employment; the Civil Service Commission administers Title 11A, which governs hiring, titles and discipline.

The label is ours. The kind of decision is our reading of the docket and the text. A decision applies the law to its own facts, may since have been appealed or overtaken, and is not a prediction for any other dispute. Nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.