N.J.A.C. 4A:2-3.7 Appeals from appointing authority decisions: State service
N.J.A.C. 4A:2-3.7, Appeals from appointing authority decisions: State service. Minor discipline may be appealed to the Commission under a negotiated labor agreement or within 20 days of the conclusion of departmental proceedings under Full text with 2 recorded amendments, 12 citing decisions, cited
Current through New Jersey Register, Vol. 58 No. 14, July 20, 2026. Reviewed as of July 26, 2026.
This is an annotated mirror, not the official publication. Verify against the Civil Service Commission before relying on it.
In plain language
The gate that catches these is not the deadline. It is the requirement that the appeal present issues of general applicability in the interpretation of law, rule or policy. Where it does not, or where the evidence for it is not fully presented, the Commission may dismiss without any further review of the merits, and that dismissal is itself a final administrative decision. The question is not whether the reprimand was fair; it is whether the case raises something reaching beyond the individual. Twenty days is the filing period, running from the conclusion of departmental proceedings for minor discipline or from the conclusion of Step Two for a grievance. Taking the Commission route on minor discipline means waiving any further appeal rights under a negotiated agreement. The filing must include the Appeal of Minor Discipline Action form or the Commission grievance form, every written record and decision from the departmental stage, and written argument and documentation, with a copy served on the appointing authority. Leaving that material out may result in dismissal. Where the standard is met, the employee carries the burden in a grievance and the appointing authority carries it in minor discipline. State service.
Written by the NJ Civil Service Navigator editorial team from the text of N.J.A.C. 4A:2-3.7. It is a description of the rule, not the rule itself, and not legal advice.
(a) Minor discipline may be appealed to the Commission under a negotiated labor agreement or within 20 days of the conclusion of departmental proceedings under this subchapter, provided any further appeal rights to mechanisms under the agreement are waived. #
1. The Civil Service Commission shall review the appeal upon a written record or such other proceeding as the Commission directs and determine if the appeal presents issues of general applicability in the interpretation of law, rule, or policy. If such issues or evidence are not fully presented, the appeal may be dismissed without further review of the merits of the appeal and the Commission's decision will be a final administrative decision. #
2. Where such issues or evidence under (a)1 above are presented, the Commission will render a final administrative decision upon a written record or such other proceeding as the Commission directs. #
(b) Grievances may be appealed to the Commission within 20 days of the conclusion of Step Two procedures under this subchapter or the conclusion of departmental procedures under a negotiated agreement. #
1. The Commission shall review the appeal on a written record or such other proceeding as the Commission directs and render the final administrative decision. #
2. Grievance appeals must present issues of general applicability in the interpretation of law, rule, or policy. If such issues or evidence are not fully presented, the appeal may be dismissed without further review of the merits of the appeal and the Commission's decision will be a final administrative decision. #
(c) Appeals shall include: #
1. A copy of the Appeal of Minor Discipline Action form or Civil Service Commission grievance form and all written records and decisions established during departmental reviews; and #
2. Written argument and documentation. #
(d) A copy of all material submitted to the Civil Service Commission must be served on the employee's appointing authority. #
(e) Failure to submit the material specified in (c) above may result in dismissal. #
(f) In Commission reviews, the employee shall present issues of general applicability in the interpretation of law, rule, or policy (see (a)1 and (b)2 above). If that standard is met: #
1. In grievance matters, the employee shall have the burden of proof. #
2. In minor disciplinary matters, the appointing authority shall have the burden of proof. #
Amendment history
Rule numbers, effective dates and New Jersey Register citations as published. 2 recorded changes.
- AmendedR.2014 d.09945 N.J.R. 500(a); 46 N.J.R. 1331(c)
- AmendedR.1989 d.56921 N.J.R. 1766(a); 21 N.J.R. 3448(b)
How this rule has been applied
12 decisions have cited N.J.A.C. 4A:2-3.7. The list below is citations to those decisions, not the decisions. We have not written summaries for this section. A citation with no summary is deliberate: we do not paraphrase a decision we have not read. Nothing here is legal advice.
Civil Service Commission final determinations (10)
- Public Employment Relations Commission. In re Shi, Dep't of Human Serv., CSC Docket No. 2021-863Docket 2021-863
- In re Drzewiecki, N.J. State Prison, CSC Docket Nos. 2021-225, et al. (Consolidated)Docket 2021-225
- In re M.H., Dep't of the Treasury, CSC Docket No. 2018-3748Docket 2018-3748
- In re Mueller, N.J. Veterans Mem'l Home at Menlo Park, CSC Docket No. 2018-290Docket 2018-290
- In re McGee, Dep't of Corrs., CSC Docket No. 2018-1361Docket 2018-1361
- State Policy Prohibiting Discrimination in the Workplace. In re L.H., Dep't of Corrs., CSC Docket Nos. 2017-1972 and 2017-4004 (Consolidated)Docket 2017-1972 and 2017-4004
- In re B.P., Dep't of Transp., CSC Docket No. 2017-3364Docket 2017-3364
- In re Boyer, Dep't of Env'tl Prot., CSC Docket No. 2018-6Docket 2018-6
- In re McGann, Dep't of Corrs., CSC Docket No. 2017-2883Docket 2017-2883
- In re P. F., Dep't of Human Servs., CSC Docket No. 2016-967Docket 2016-967
Office of Administrative Law initial decisions (2)
- In re BookerDocket CSV 6800-05
- In re BowserDocket CSV 6519-06
Commission decisions citing 4A:2-3.7
12 decisions of the Civil Service Commission since January 16, 2019 cite this section (denied 11, granted in part 1, as the minutes record the outcome). The newest:
- In the Matter of Donald Kilpatrick, Department of Corrections CSC Docket No. 2025-869 · July 22, 2026 · Discipline · Denied
- In the Matter of William Scaglione, Department of Labor and Workforce Development CSC Docket No. 2026-990 · July 22, 2026 · Denied
- In the Matter of Jennifer Akturk, Department of Corrections CSC Docket No. 2026-993 · November 5, 2025 · Request for reconsideration · Denied
- In the Matter of Jennifer Akturk, Department of Corrections CSC Docket No. 2025-1626 · September 24, 2025 · Discipline · Denied
- In the Matters of Michele-Lynne Muni and Sabrina Haugebrook, Department of Corrections CSC Docket No. 2024-1163 · November 27, 2024 · Denied
Rules that point here
- 4A:2-1.4 Burden of proof
- 4A:2-3.2 Minor discipline appeal to appointing authority: State service
- 4A:6-5.3 PAR use and review: State service
- 4A:6-7.8 Challenges to telework eligibility denial, revocation, or adjustment
Elsewhere in Minor Discipline and Grievances
- 4A:2-3.1 General provisions
- 4A:2-3.2 Minor discipline appeal to appointing authority: State service
- 4A:2-3.3 Grievance appeal to appointing authority: State service
- 4A:2-3.4 Grievance procedure: Step One: State service
- 4A:2-3.5 Grievance procedure: Step Two
- 4A:2-3.6 Conduct and scheduling of hearings and grievance meetings: State service