M.M. Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, CSC Docket No. 2015-2963
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of April 24, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2015-2963: discrimination, retaliation or state policy, denied. M.M., Clinical Psychologist 2, Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, Department of Health, appeals the determination of the Assistant Commissioner, Department of Human Servic
Commission decisions · Meeting of April 24, 2019
M.M., Clinical Psychologist 2, Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, Department of Health, appeals the determination of the Assistant Commissioner, Department of Human Services, stating that the appellant failed to present sufficient evidence to support a finding that she had been subjected to violations of the New Jersey State Policy Prohibiting Discrimination in the Work Place.
- Matter
- Discrimination, retaliation or State Policy
- Decided
- April 24, 2019, item A-6
- Outcome
- Denied
- ALJ's recommendation
- Deny the appeal.
- What the Commission did with it
- Adopted the ALJ's recommendation
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (A-006 4-24-19.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission affirmed the recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge.
The decision
CSC published this decision as a scanned image. The text below was recognized by OCR, read twice and checked against the meeting minutes, but OCR can misread a word. The official document is the record.
BackgroundThe appeal of M.M., Clinical Psychologist 2, Ancora Psychiatric Hospital, Department of Health, appeals the determination of the Assistant Commissioner, Department of Human Services, stating that she failed to present sufficient evidence to support a finding that she had been subjected to violations of the New Jersey State Policy Prohibiting Discrimination in the Workplace, was heard by Administrative Law Judge Sarah G. Crowley, who rendered her initial decision on March 21, 2019. Exceptions were filed on behalf of the appellant and a reply to exceptions was filed on behalf of the appointing authority.
AnalysisHaving considered the record and the Administrative Law Judge’s initial decision, and having made an independent evaluation of the record, including a thorough review of the exceptions and reply filed by the parties, the Civil Service Commission, at its meeting of April 24, 2019, accepted and adopted the Findings of Fact and Conclusion as contained in the attached Administrative Law Judge’s initial decision denying the appeal.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be denied.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it by OCR and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.