K.R., CSC Docket No. 2018-3079
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of June 12, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2018-3079: removal from an eligible list, denied. K.R. appeals her rejection as a Correctional Police Officer candidate by the Department of Corrections and its request to remove her name from the eligible list for Correctional Po
Commission decisions · Meeting of June 12, 2019
K.R. appeals her rejection as a Correctional Police Officer candidate by the Department of Corrections and its request to remove her name from the eligible list for Correctional Police Officer (S9988V) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
- Matter
- Removal from an eligible list
- Decided
- June 12, 2019, item B-3
- Outcome
- Denied
- Stated ground
- Psychological evaluation
- Title
- CORRECTIONAL POLICE OFFICER
- Examination
- S9988V
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-003 06-12-19.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
This docket at the Commission
- February 20, 2019, item B-4Referred for further reviewThe Civil Service Commission directed that the appellant be referred for an independent psychological evaluation.
- June 12, 2019, item B-3DeniedThe Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
The decision
BackgroundK.R. appeals her rejection as a Correctional Police Officer1 candidate by the Department of Corrections and its request to remove her name from the eligible list for Correctional Police Officer (S9988V) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
This appeal was referred for independent evaluation by the Civil Service
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.