Reallocation of Assistant Environmental Technician from the Competitive Division to the Non-Competitive Division of the Career Service, CSC Docket No. 2018-328
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of January 29, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2018-328: title creation, reallocation or retitling, granted. The Division of Agency Services recommends the reallocation of the Assistant Environmental Technician title to the non-competitive division of the career service in
Commission decisions · Meeting of January 29, 2020
The Division of Agency Services recommends the reallocation of the Assistant Environmental Technician title to the non-competitive division of the career service in accordance with N.J.A.C. 4A:3-1.2.
A note on the record.
The meeting minutes give this matter CSC Docket No. 2018-328; the caption of the decision prints 2018-3284. This page follows the minutes.
- Matter
- Title creation, reallocation or retitling
- Decided
- January 29, 2020, item B-44
- Outcome
- Granted
- Recorded vote
- L. Webster Cobb (Yes), Dolores Gorczyca (Recused), Daniel W. O’Mullan (Yes), Diomedes Tsitouras (Yes)
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-044 01-29-20.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundThe Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) recommends the reallocation of the Assistant Environmental Technician title to the non-competitive division of the career service in accordance with N.J.A.C. 4A:3-1.2.
By way of background, the instant request originated with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). In support of the DEP’s request, Agency Services explains that competitive testing is not practicable due to the nature of the knowledge, skills and abilities associated with this position. In this regard, it notes that the title requires only the completion of one or more high school-level courses in mathematics and one or more high school-level courses in science. Further, it observes that this title does not have experience requirement.
Agency records do not indicate that there are any employees are presently serving in the subject title. Furthermore, agency records do not show that there are any pending examination announcements or active eligible lists for the subject title.
Agency Services advises that the appropriate negotiations representative has been notified of the proposal. Agency Services indicates that it did not receive any feedback based upon the foregoing notification. Finally, Agency Services requests that the changes specified in this title reallocation become effective at the beginning of the first pay period following the Civil Service Commission’s (Commission) approval of these actions.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:3-1.2 provides, in part, that the Commission may reallocate titles from the competitive to the non-competitive division when competitive testing is not practicable due to the nature of the knowledge, skills, and abilities associated with the job or when certification procedures based on ranked eligible lists have not or are not likely to meet the needs of appointing authorities due to such factors as salary, geographic location, recruitment problems and working conditions.
AnalysisBased upon the foregoing, ample reasons exist for the reallocation of the proposed title to the non-competitive division of the career service. In this regard, the only education required for this title is the completion of two high school-level courses. Furthermore, this title does not have a specific experience requirement. Therefore, competitive testing is not practicable for this title.
ORDER
Based on all of the above, it is ordered that the title of Assistant Environmental Technician be reallocated to the non-competitive division. It is further ordered that such action be effective at the beginning of the first pay period following the Commission’s approval.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.