D.M., CSC Docket No. 2018-3419
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of September 25, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2018-3419: removal from an eligible list, denied. D.M., represented by Ricardo Gonzalez, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Police Officer candidate by the City of Newark and its request to remove his name from the eligible lis
Commission decisions · Meeting of September 25, 2019
D.M., represented by Ricardo Gonzalez, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Police Officer candidate by the City of Newark and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Police Officer (S9999U) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
- Matter
- Removal from an eligible list
- Decided
- September 25, 2019, item B-2
- Outcome
- Denied
- Stated ground
- Psychological evaluation
- Title
- POLICE OFFICER
- Examination
- S9999U
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-002 09-25-19_Redacted.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
This docket at the Commission
- June 12, 2019, item B-2Referred for further reviewThe Civil Service Commission directed that the appellant be referred for an independent psychological evaluation.
- September 25, 2019, item B-2DeniedThe Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
The decision
BackgroundD.M., represented by Ricardo Gonzalez, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Police Officer candidate by the City of Newark and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Police Officer (S9999U) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
This appeal was referred for independent evaluation by the Civil Service
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.