NJ Civil Service Navigator

Christopher Weir, CSC Docket No. 2019-1729

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of March 6, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-1729: examination eligibility, granted. Christopher Weir appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the experience requirements for the open-competitive examination for the d

Commission decisions · Meeting of March 6, 2019

Christopher Weir appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the experience requirements for the open-competitive examination for the dual title Equipment Operator/Truck Driver (C0696W), Cumberland County.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
March 6, 2019, item B-26
Outcome
Granted
Examination
C0696W
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-026 03-06-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundChristopher Weir appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the experience requirements for the open-competitive examination for the dual title Equipment Operator/Truck Driver (C0696W), Cumberland County. A dual title is a title that combines two separate titles into one classification; applicants need to meet the minimum requirements of both titles in order to be declared eligible

The subject examination had a closing date of June 4, 2018 and was open to residents of Cumberland County who possessed one year of experience in the operation and maintenance of construction and maintenance equipment AND one year of experience in driving a truck with a single axle. The appellant was found to be ineligible based on a lack of experience. There are four provisional incumbents, and five candidates appear on the eligible list. The eligible list has been certified twice, and one appointment has been made.

On his application, the appellant listed one position, provisional Equipment Operator/Truck Driver, and he was credited with seven months of experience. As such, he was found to be lacking one year, five months of required experience.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant provides further information regarding his provisional position, and he lists two positions not provided on his application, one with Helena Chemical from March 2016 to September 2017, and one with Growmark FS from January 2015 to March 2016. In both positions, he operated numerous types of equipment and drove a single-axle truck. The equipment he used included articulated wheel loader with bucket, backhoe, front-end loader, and mowers.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive examination announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Commission may relax a rule for good cause in particular situations, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.

AnalysisThe appellant received the maximum credit, seven months, for the one position that he listed on his application, his provisional position in the subject title. The application states, “You may be declared ineligible or you may not receive proper credit for scoring purposes if you do not properly complete your application,” and “Since your application may be your only ‘test paper,’ be sure it is complete and accurate. Failure to complete your application properly may cause you to be declared ineligible, lower your score, or possibly cause you to fail.” The published announcement also clearly specifies the relevant time frames for filing and amending applications. As he listed only her provisional position on his application, no further experience could have been credited.

RuleFurther, N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) provides that an application may only be amended prior to the announced closing date. Nevertheless, there were five eligible candidates and one appointment has been made, and four provisional incumbents were serving when the list was issued. The appellant has indicated that he possesses at least an additional three years in two positions wherein he both drove a single-axle truck and operated construction and maintenance equipment. He continues to serve in his provisional position, and the list is not competitive. Under these particular circumstances, good cause has been established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) to accept the appellant’s supplemental experience, for eligibility purposes only, and admit him to the subject examination for prospective appointment only.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective appointment only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.