Thesy Inga, CSC Docket No. 2019-1744
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 6, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-1744: examination eligibility, granted. Thesy Inga appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination
Commission decisions · Meeting of February 6, 2019
Thesy Inga appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination for Computer Operator (M0478W), Paterson.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- February 6, 2019, item B-36
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- COMPUTER OPERATOR
- Employer
- Paterson
- Examination
- M0478W
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-036 02-06-19.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundThesy Inga appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open- competitive examination for Computer Operator (M0478W), Paterson.
The subject examination had a closing date of April 23, 2018 and was open to residents of Paterson City and Passaic County who had one year of experience in the operation of a mainframe/departmental sized computer console in a computer room. Satisfactory completion of a course of study in computer operations at an accredited college, university, technical, or vocational school could be substituted for the one year of work experience. The appellant was found to be ineligible based on a lack of experience. As there were no admitted applicants, the examination was canceled on January 6, 2019.
The appellant listed three positions on her application, Computer Operator, Business Unit Application Support Analyst/IT Analyst with TD Bank, and Bilingual Customer Service Representative with TD Bank. The appellant was credited with seven months of experience in her provisional position, and was found to be lacking five months of qualifying experience.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant states that she accrued applicable experience as a Business Unit Application Support Analyst/IT Analyst and she provides a few of her duties in that position.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive examination announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) provides that an application may only be amended prior to the announced closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission may relax a rule for good cause in particular situations, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisInitially, the appellant was correctly found ineligible for the subject examination. The appellant was credited with seven months of experience in her provisional position. Her position as Business Unit Application Support Analyst/IT Analyst did not have the announced experience requirement as the primary focus. However, the examination was cancelled, and the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the title under test. Based on the circumstances presented, good cause has been established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) to accept the appellant’s additional experience beyond the closing date and admit her to the examination.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, the examination cancellation be rescinded, and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.