Dietician (M0080V), CSC Docket No. 2019-1982
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of April 24, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-1982: certification or appointment, ordered. Plainfield requests permission not to make an appointment from the July 16, 2018 certification for Dietician (M0080V).
Commission decisions · Meeting of April 24, 2019
Plainfield requests permission not to make an appointment from the July 16, 2018 certification for Dietician (M0080V).
- Matter
- Certification or appointment
- Decided
- April 24, 2019, item B-4
- Outcome
- Ordered
- Examination
- M0080V
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-004 04-24-19.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission granted the appointment waiver and assessed selection costs in the amount of $2,048.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundPlainfield requests permission not to make an appointment from the July 16, 2018 certification for Dietician (M0080V).
The record reveals that in December 2016, Plainfield provisionally appointed Ryan Farley, pending open competitive examination procedures, to the subject title. The M0080V examination resulted in an employment roster of eight eligibles, which promulgated on June 29, 2017 and expires on June 28, 2020. On July 16, 2018, a certification was issued which contained the names of the eight eligibles. Thereafter, Plainfield requested an appointment waiver. Personnel records indicate that Farley was removed from the title.
The Division of Appeals and Regulatory Affairs indicated to Plainfield that it received its request for an appointment waiver in this matter. Moreover, it was advised that if an appointment waiver was granted, it could be assessed for the costs of the selection process in the amount of $2,048 and that it could submit reasons why costs of the selection process should not be assessed. However, although given this opportunity, Plainfield did not respond. Further, it is noted that Plainfield took no action to obviate the need for this examination at the time of the announcement or prior to its administration. See N.J.A.C. 4A:10-2.2(a)1.
A review of agency records indicates that there are no other employees recorded as serving provisionally pending open competitive examination procedures in the subject title with Plainfield.
CONCLUSION
In accordance with N.J.S.A. 11A:4-5, once the examination process has been initiated due to the appointment of a provisional employee or due to an appointing authority’s request to fill a vacancy, the appointing authority must make an appointment from the resulting eligible list if there are three or more interested and eligible candidates. The only exception to this mandate may be made for a valid reason such as fiscal constraints.
In the instant matter, the examination for the subject title was generated as the result of the provisional appointment of Ryan Farley to the subject title. However, after a complete certification was issued, the appointing authority indicated that Farley was removed from the subject title. Consequently, since there are no provisionals serving in the title at issue, there is sufficient justification for an appointment waiver.
Although an appointment waiver is granted in this matter, both N.J.S.A. 11A:4-5 and N.J.A.C. 4A:10-2.2(a)2 state that if an appointing authority receives permission not to make an appointment, it can be ordered to reimburse for the costs of the selection process. While administering examinations and providing the names of eligible job candidates to the jurisdictions under the civil service system are two of the primary activities of this agency, these costly efforts are thwarted when appointing authorities fail to utilize the resulting eligible lists to make appointments and candidates have needlessly expended their time, efforts and money to take these examinations in hopes of being considered for a permanent appointment. In this regard, the removal of the provisional is insufficient to support a waiver of the costs of the selection process. Thus, although a waiver is granted, it is appropriate that the appointing authority be assessed $2,048 for the costs of the selection process.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that a waiver of the appointment requirement be granted. Additionally, the Civil Service Commission orders that Plainfield be assessed for the costs of the selection process in the amount of $2,048 to be paid within 30 days of the issuance of this order.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.