NJ Civil Service Navigator

B.C., CSC Docket No. 2019-2085

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of May 22, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-2085: examination scoring or administration, granted. B.C. requests to be permitted to submit a late application for the Family Service Specialist 1 (PS4824K), Department of Children and Families, examination.

Commission decisions · Meeting of May 22, 2019

B.C. requests to be permitted to submit a late application for the Family Service Specialist 1 (PS4824K), Department of Children and Families, examination.

Matter
Examination scoring or administration
Decided
May 22, 2019, item B-9
Outcome
Granted
Employer
Children and Families
Examination
PS4824K
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-009 05-22-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundB.C. requests to be permitted to submit a late application for the Family Service Specialist 1 (PS4824K), Department of Children and Families (DCF), examination.

By way of background, the announcement for the subject examination was issued on October 1, 2018 and was open to employees in the competitive division who were currently serving as a Family Service Specialist 2 or Family Service Specialist 2, Bilingual in Spanish and English, and possessed an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the October 22, 2018, closing date. It is noted that over 1,000 applicants have been admitted to the examination, which was administered on May 4, 2019.

On appeal to the Civil Service Commission (Commission), the appellant, a Family Service Specialist 2,1 states that he suffers from severe dyslexia and has trouble with reading and subsequent comprehension of what he is reading. He asserts that his dyslexia played a role in incorrectly filing for the Supervising Family Service Specialist 1 (PS4823K) examination, of which he was deemed ineligible. In support of his appeal, the appellant provides a letter from his attending physician pertaining to his disability and a ADA/504 Accommodation Plan developed for him while he was in college. Additionally, agency records reflect

1 Agency records indicate that the appellant has been serving as a Family Service Specialist 2 since

July 25, 2015.

that the appellant was approved for an ADA accommodation in November of 2018 that allows him to take an examination in a reader format.2

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(e) provides that unless otherwise provided for by the Chairperson of the Commission or designee, applications for promotional examinations shall be submitted to the Commission no later than 4:00 p.m. on the announced application filing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) provides that a rule may be relaxed for good cause in a particular circumstance in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.

AnalysisIn the instant matter, the appellant did not submit an application by the closing date for the subject examination and incorrectly filed for the wrong examination. The Commission generally denies requests to accept late examination applications, as N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(e) requires applicants to file their applications by the closing date. In that regard, in In the Matters of Supervising Family Service Specialist 2 (PS1035K), Supervising Family Service Specialist 2 (Bilingual in Spanish and English) (PS1036K), Supervising Family Service Specialist 1 (PS1032K), Supervising Family Service Specialist 1 (PS1015K), and Family Service Specialist 1 (PS2267K), Department of Children and Families, (CSC, decided October 19, 2016), the Commission determined that it would not permit applicants who file for an incorrect examination symbol to file a late application for the correct symbol given that there are numerous warnings provided to ensure the proper symbol is used when initially applying for the test. However, under the circumstances presented, the Commission finds that there is good cause to relax N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(e) and allow the appellant to submit a late application for the subject examination.

The Commission emphasizes that the dual purpose of the Civil Service system is to ensure efficient public service for State and local governments and to provide appointment and advancement opportunities to Civil Service employees based on their merit and abilities. These interests are best served when more, rather than fewer, individuals are presented with employment opportunities. See Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel, 154 N.J. 121 (1998).

Finally, the Commission notes that the appellant’s remedy is based on the particular circumstances of this matter, and for future examination announcements, he must timely file an application. As this remedy is limited to the unique circumstances of this matter, it does not provide a precedent in any other matter.

2 Questions will be read to the appellant for his response. Extra time will be allotted for this type of examination process.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this petition be granted, and B.C. be permitted to submit an application for the Family Service Specialist 1 (PS4824K), DCF, examination. It is further ordered that B.C. submit a promotional application and the $25.00 application processing fee to the Division of Agency Services within 20 days of the issuance date of this decision. Upon receipt of the application and processing fee, it is ordered that his application be processed for prospective appointment consideration. Finally, if B.C.’s application and the required payment are not postmarked within 20 days of the issuance date of this decision, he will not be entitled to have an application for the subject examination processed.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

  • Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel 154 N.J. 121

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.