NJ Civil Service Navigator

Terry Buchanan, CSC Docket No. 2019-2868

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of June 12, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-2868: request for reconsideration, granted. Terry Buchanan, a Code Enforcement Officer Trainee with the City of Newark, Department of Engineering, represented by Seth Gollin, Staff Representative, AFSCME, petitions the Civil

Commission decisions · Meeting of June 12, 2019

Terry Buchanan, a Code Enforcement Officer Trainee with the City of Newark, Department of Engineering, represented by Seth Gollin, Staff Representative, AFSCME, petitions the Civil Service Commission for reconsideration of the decision rendered on March 6, 2019, in which the Director of the Division of Appeals and Regulatory Affairs denied his request for a hearing with respect to his removal.

Matter
Request for reconsideration
Decided
June 12, 2019, item B-30
Outcome
Granted
Title
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER TRAINEE
Employer
Newark
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-030 06-12-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this petition be granted.

The decision

CSC published this decision as a scanned image. The text below was recognized by OCR, read twice and checked against the meeting minutes, but OCR can misread a word. The official document is the record.

BackgroundTerry Buchanan, a Code Enforcement Officer Trainee with the City of Newark, Department of Engineering, represented by Seth Gollin, Staff Representative, AFSCME, petitions the Civil Service Commission (Commission) for

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it by OCR and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.