NJ Civil Service Navigator

Evan Magee, CSC Docket No. 2019-2897

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of June 12, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-2897: examination scoring or administration, denied. Evan Magee requests that additional volunteer points be added to his final average for the eligible list for Fire Fighter (M1864W), Pennsauken, produced from the examinatio

Commission decisions · Meeting of June 12, 2019

Evan Magee requests that additional volunteer points be added to his final average for the eligible list for Fire Fighter (M1864W), Pennsauken, produced from the examination for Fire Fighter (M9999W).

Matter
Examination scoring or administration
Decided
June 12, 2019, item B-26
Outcome
Denied
Title
FIRE FIGHTER
Employer
Pennsauken Township
Examination
M1864W, M9999W
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-026 06-12-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be denied.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

Appellant's argumentEvan Magee requests that additional volunteer points be added to his final average for the eligible list for Fire Fighter (M1864W), Pennsauken, produced from the examination for Fire Fighter (M9999W).

BackgroundThe examination had a closing date of August 31, 2018, and consisted of a written portion, and a physical performance portion which is pass/fail and is administered after list issuance. The appellant passed the written examination and received a final average of 78.080 and his name appeared on nine lists, including (M1864W), Pennsauken, on which he ranked 14th. On his application, the appellant indicated that he commenced his volunteer service with Pennsauken Township on November 1, 2004.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant states that he became an active volunteer fireman on November 1, 2004, and should receive the maximum number of volunteer points. He states that an award of only three points is incorrect, and he should have at least seven, which is the number his Fire Chief said he would be receiving.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.S.A. 40A:14-45 provides in pertinent part: “in any municipality where an examination is scheduled to determine appointments to the paid or part-paid fire department and force, any qualified fireman having served in the volunteer fire company or force of the municipality for at least 2 years next preceding such appointment shall be entitled, in addition to his earned rating, to service credits of not less than 3 nor more than 10 points as may be determined by the governing body of the municipality or the authority in charge.”

AnalysisThe application indicated that “volunteer fire fighters must have a minimum of two years of continuous volunteer service in the jurisdiction where they serve as of the date of appointment to a paid position.” This was clarified by the regulation, which specifies that two years of continuous volunteer service must be completed as of the closing date. See N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.15(g)1.

The closing date was August 31, 2018, and the appellant indicated on his application that he began volunteer service on November 1, 2004. When applicants indicate volunteer membership, the Division of Test Development and Analytics contacts the Fire Chief of the jurisdiction regarding volunteer work, as the statute states that credit is given for service, not for membership. In this case, the Fire Chief indicated that the appellant started on November 1, 2004, but did not provide volunteer service from 2009 through 2015. As above, N.J.S.A. 40A:14-45 provides that volunteer service, for which points are awarded, must be “at least 2 years next preceding such appointment.” That is, the service must be continuous, and it is not calculated in the aggregate. As the appellant did not perform continuous service, his start date was January 1, 2016 and he had two full years of continuous volunteer service as of the closing date. As such, his award of three volunteer points is correct.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be denied.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.