Francine Gary, CSC Docket No. 2019-3252
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of April 15, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2019-3252: examination scoring or administration, granted. Francine Gary, a former Supervisor 1 with the Judiciary, Vicinage 11, Passaic County, requests that the provision of N.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.4(a), which govern the time period in
Commission decisions · Meeting of April 15, 2020
Francine Gary, a former Supervisor 1 with the Judiciary, Vicinage 11, Passaic County, requests that the provision of N.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.4(a), which govern the time period in which employees must file an application for Supplemental Compensation on Retirement (SCOR), be relaxed to permit her to submit a late application for SCOR benefits.
- Matter
- Examination scoring or administration
- Decided
- April 15, 2020, item B-29
- Outcome
- Granted
- Employer
- Judiciary
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-029 04-15-20.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundFrancine Gary, a former Supervisor 1 with the Judiciary, Vicinage 11, Passaic County, requests that the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.4(a), which govern the time period in which employees must file an application for Supplemental Compensation on Retirement (SCOR), be relaxed to permit her to submit a late application for SCOR benefits.
By way of background, the appellant retired from State service, effective January 1, 2018. However, a SCOR application for the appellant was not forwarded to this agency by the appointing authority within one year of her retirement date. Specifically, the application, which sought a $212.95 SCOR payment, was forwarded in April 2019 but returned by the Division of Agency Services as untimely.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal to the Civil Service Commission (Commission), the appellant maintains that it was not her fault that “the little time [she] had left and should have been compensated for fell through the cracks” as it was the Human Resources Division that forgot to do its job.
Appointing authority's argumentIn response, the appointing authority asserts that the error was due to a series of staff departures and new arrivals within the Human Resources Division that caused delays in the timely filing of the appellant’s application. The appointing authority states that the unintentional delay and inconvenience caused was clearly a mistake from its side and it takes full responsibility. The appointing authority does not oppose this appeal.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.3(a) provides that, upon retirement, an employee is entitled to SCOR to be “computed at the rate of one-half the employee’s daily rate of pay for each day of earned and unused accumulated sick leave at the effective date of retirement.” N.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.4(a) provides that an employee may file an application for SCOR within one year of the effective date of retirement. N.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.4(c) provides that after receipt of the notice of retirement approval and SCOR application, the appointing authority shall forward to this agency within 45 days: (1) a personnel action request certifying the number of days of earned and unused accumulated sick leave and the amount of SCOR to be paid; (2) a copy of the notice of retirement approval; and (3) a completed SCOR application form. N.J.A.C. 4A:1- 1.2(c) provides that a rule may be relaxed for good cause.
AnalysisIn this matter, the appellant retired from State service effective January 1, 2018, but the SCOR application was not forwarded to this agency until April 2019, outside the one-year time period established by N.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.4(a). The appointing authority indicates that this delay was due to its own mistake and that it does not oppose this appeal. In this regard, the appointing authority explains that a series of staff departures and new arrivals within the Human Resources Division caused delays in the timely filing of the appellant’s application. Although both a former employee and an appointing authority should be aware of the rules governing SCOR and time periods noted therein, it is the appointing authority’s responsibility to properly and promptly provide for the processing of appropriate documentation to effectuate SCOR payments. In such situations, the former employee should not be penalized with a diminution of a monetary entitlement. Accordingly, it is appropriate to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.4(a) to permit the appellant to apply for SCOR.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this request be granted, the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.4(a) be relaxed, and Francine Gary’s SCOR application be processed.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.