O.C., CSC Docket No. 2019-669
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 26, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2019-669: removal from an eligible list, granted. O.C., represented by Donald A. DiGioia, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Police Officer candidate by the City of Elizabeth and its request to remove his name from the eligible
Commission decisions · Meeting of February 26, 2020
O.C., represented by Donald A. DiGioia, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Police Officer candidate by the City of Elizabeth and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Police Officer (S9999U) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
- Matter
- Removal from an eligible list
- Decided
- February 26, 2020, item B-2
- Outcome
- Granted
- Stated ground
- Psychological evaluation
- Title
- POLICE OFFICER
- Examination
- S9999U
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-002 02-26-20_Redacted.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
This docket at the Commission
- November 6, 2019, item B-1Referred for further reviewThe Civil Service Commission directed that the appellant be referred for an independent psychological evaluation.
- February 26, 2020, item B-2GrantedThe Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
The decision
BackgroundO.C., represented by Donald A. DiGioia, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Police Officer candidate by the City of Elizabeth and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Police Officer (S9999U) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position
This appeal was referred for independent evaluation by the Civil Service
Later decisions that cite this one
- O.C. (February 3, 2021)
- O.C. (February 3, 2021)
- O.C. (December 15, 2021)
- O.C. (December 15, 2021)
- O.C. (March 23, 2022)
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.