Ellis Tamasi, CSC Docket No. 2020-106
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of July 31, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2020-106: examination scoring or administration, granted. Ellis Tamasi requests to file a late application for the open competitive examination for Parole Officer Recruit (S1000A), Statewide.
Commission decisions · Meeting of July 31, 2019
Ellis Tamasi requests to file a late application for the open competitive examination for Parole Officer Recruit (S1000A), Statewide.
- Matter
- Examination scoring or administration
- Decided
- July 31, 2019, item B-29
- Outcome
- Granted
- Examination
- S1000A
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-029 07-31-19.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
Appellant's argumentEllis Tamasi requests to file a late application for the open competitive examination for Parole Officer Recruit (S1000A), Statewide.
BackgroundThe examination at issue was announced with requirements that had to be met as of the June 21, 2019 closing date. Applications needed to be filed by 4:00 PM on the closing date. Agency records indicate that nearly 1200 candidates applied for the subject examination. The list has not yet promulgated.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the petitioner states that he contacted this agency in May 2019 regarding the next upcoming date for the Parole Officer Recruit examination. He claims that this agency advised him that the Parole Officer Recruit examination was included with the Law Enforcement Examination (LEE) series, which was going to be announced in July 2019. Therefore, the petitioner was advised to check the Civil Service Commission’s (Commission) website in July 2019. He indicates that he went on vacation in June 2019, and upon his return, he checked the Commission’s website on July 2, 2019 and found that there was no announcement for the Parole Officer Recruit examination and there was only an announcement for the LEE. The petitioner states that he contacted this agency on July 3, 2019 and this time was advised that the Parole Officer Recruit and the LEE were separate examinations. Further, this agency informed him that the closing date for the subject examination was on June 21, 2019 and, therefore, it was suggested that he file an appeal. The petitioner highlights that he is currently a Probation Officer and represents that it has been his goal for many years to become a Parole Officer.
CONLCUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(e) provides that applications must be filed no later than the announced filing deadline. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Commission may relax a rule for good cause in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisIn this matter, the petitioner asserts that he initially contacted this agency in May 2019 to inquire as to when the subject examination was going to be announced. He states that he was advised that it was going to be announced in July 2019 as part of the LEE. Thereafter, the petitioner indicates that he went on the Commission website in early July 2019 to look for the subject examination announcement only to see that it was not there. He then contacted this agency a second time only to be advised that the deadline for the subject examination had passed on June 21, 2019, as it was a separate examination that was not part of the LEE. The Commission notes that the dual purpose of the Civil Service system is to ensure efficient public service for State and local governments and to provide appointment and advancement opportunities to Civil Service employees based on their merit and abilities. These interests are best served when more, rather than fewer, individuals are presented with employment opportunities. See Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel, 154 N.J. 121 (1998). Further, there are nearly 1200 applicants and multiple vacancies are anticipated for the subject title, so the candidate pool will not be significantly impacted by allowing another candidate to file. Additionally, the petitioner indicated that he contacted this agency twice about the subject examination and was initially provided incorrect information. Under these circumstances, the Commission finds that for equitable reasons the petitioner should be allowed to apply for the subject examination. Therefore, the Commission finds that there is good cause to relax N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(e) and to allow the petitioner to submit his application and application fee after the closing deadline for prospective employment opportunities only.
This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this petition be granted, and Ellis Tamasi be permitted to submit an application for the Parole Officer Recruit (S1000A), Statewide, examination. It is further ordered that Mr. Tamasi submit an open competitive application and the $25.00 application processing fee to the Division of Agency Services. The application and processing fee must be postmarked no later than 15 days from the issuance date of this decision. Upon receipt of the application and processing fee, it is ordered that his application be processed. Finally, if Mr.
Tamasi’s application and the required payment are not postmarked on or before the 15th day after the issuance date of this decision, he will not be entitled to have an application for the subject examination processed.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
Decisions this one cites
- Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel 154 N.J. 121
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.