Lenaya Wilcox, CSC Docket No. 2020-1085
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of January 15, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2020-1085: examination scoring or administration, denied. Lenaya Wilcox requests a retest of the examination for Rehabilitation Counselor, Mental Health (S0846V), Statewide.
Commission decisions · Meeting of January 15, 2020
Lenaya Wilcox requests a retest of the examination for Rehabilitation Counselor, Mental Health (S0846V), Statewide.
- Matter
- Examination scoring or administration
- Decided
- January 15, 2020, item B-31
- Outcome
- Denied
- Title
- REHABILITATION COUNSELOR MENTAL HEALTH
- Examination
- S0846V
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-031 01-15-20.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be denied.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
Appellant's argumentLenaya Wilcox requests a retest of the examination for Rehabilitation Counselor Mental Health (S0846V), Statewide. It is noted that the appellant failed the examination.
BackgroundThe appellant took the subject examination on September 5, 2019, which consisted of 80 multiple choice questions. She obtained a raw score of 42, and the passing point was 48; therefore, she failed the examination. In a letter received October 16, 2019, the appellant indicated that she had a medical issue on the examination date which prevented her from completing the examination. She provides a diagnosis from a physician on a note dated October 11, 2019, and a list of medications. She requests a retest. She adds that the medical documentation indicated a chronic condition, and that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) should be aware that this would mean she could not take the test on September 5, 2019. She also states that she was not aware that she could inform the monitor on the test date of her condition and get a make-up examination. It is noted that 21 candidates passed the examination, the list has been certified four times, and no appointments have yet been made.
CONCLUSION
N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.9(a), Make-up Examinations, provides that make-up examinations, except for police, fire and professional level engineering promotional examinations, may be authorized for the following reasons:
1. Error by the Commission if or appointing authority;
2. Serious illness or disability of the candidate on the test date, provided the candidate submits a doctor’s certificate specifying that the candidate was not able to take the test on that day for medical reasons;
3. Documented serious illness or death in the candidate’s immediate family;
4. Natural disaster;
5. Prior vacation or travel plans outside of New Jersey or any contiguous state, which cannot be reasonably changed, as evidenced by a sworn statement and relevant documentation; and
6. When required for certain persons returning from military service (see N.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.6A); and,
7. Other valid reasons.
N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.4(c), (Review of examination items, scoring and administration) states that appeals pertaining to administration of the examination must be filed in writing at the examination site on the day of the examination. The record establishes that the appellant was scheduled to take the written portion of the examination on September 5, 2019 and subsequently failed it. The appellant knew she had a medical condition before the examination date, and states that she was ill during the examination, but did not notify the Civil Service Commission of her condition until October 16, 2019, after she received her examination results. As such, this appeal is dismissed as untimely.
Nevertheless, it is noted that the Commission is delegated by the Legislature with implementing and enforcing Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes and performing duties as prescribed by law and the rules of the New Jersey Administrative Code. See N.J.A.C. 4A:1-3.3 and N.J.S.A. 11A:2-2. As such, it has the responsibility to ensure that rules are maintained, followed and upheld. In this case, there are rules regarding authorization of make-up examinations and, when there is a serious illness of the candidate on the test date, the rules direct that the candidate must submit a doctor’s certificate specifying that she was not able to take the test on that day for medical reasons. These rules are available on the Commission’s website, and are printed on the instructions on the Notification to Appear of Examination, which the appellant received two weeks before the test date. Although the appellant was on notice that she would need to provide medical documentation in order to take a make-up examination, she did not do so at the time of the examination.
On appeal, the appellant provides a doctor’s note which does not state that her condition precluded her from taking the examination on September 5, 2019. The appellant cannot be placed on the eligible list due to her test score. She has taken the examination and, in fairness to other candidates, the appellant cannot be given the same examination again. While candidates who have not taken the examination can be given a make-up examination, there are no provisions in the rules for a retest. The list is complete with 21 eligibles, and the appellant’s situation does not meet the criteria for a makeup examination.
A thorough review the record indicates that the appellant has failed to support her burden of proof in this matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be denied.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.