R.P., CSC Docket No. 2020-1165
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of January 29, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2020-1165: leave or benefits, denied. R.P., a Technical Assistant 2, appeals the decision of the Department of Community Affairs which denied her request to participate in the Donated Leave Program intermittently.
Commission decisions · Meeting of January 29, 2020
R.P., a Technical Assistant 2, appeals the decision of the Department of Community Affairs which denied her request to participate in the Donated Leave Program intermittently.
- Matter
- Leave or benefits
- Decided
- January 29, 2020, item B-28
- Outcome
- Denied
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-028 01-29-20.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundR.P., a Technical Assistant 2 appeals the decision of the Department of Community Affairs which denied her request to participate in the Donated Leave Program (DLP) intermittently.
By way of background, the appellant was approved to participate in the DLP from September 2017 through April 2018 on the account that she suffered from a catastrophic health condition. Upon her return to work, the appellant was approved to participate in the DLP intermittently. In January 2019, the appointing authority advised the appellant that because she returned to work and was “beyond the period of time for which to use intermittent leave,” she was “closed out of the DLP.” In September 2019, the appellant requested participation in the DLP on an intermittent basis to attend doctor appointments and physical therapy on the account of her original illness. The appointing authority denied her request because under its DLP policy, an employee may be approved to participate in the DLP intermittently only if he or she is returning to work from a prolonged absence due to a catastrophic illness.
On appeal, the appellant lists her current medical conditions and treatment regimen and requests that an “an exception in [her] unique case” be made to allow to participate in the DLP.
Appointing authority's argumentIn response, the appointing authority reiterates that it denied appellant’s request to participate in the DLP intermittently because she was not returning to work from a prolonged absence due to a catastrophic illness, as its policy requires.
It states that while it is sympathetic to the appellant’s medical condition, it must adhere to a policy that maintains fairness and consistency among its employees.
CONCLUSION
N.J.S.A. 11A:6-5.11 (DLP) states, in pertinent part, that a State employee shall be eligible to receive donated sick or vacation leave if the employee suffers from a catastrophic health condition or injury. A catastrophic health condition or injury is defined as a life-threatening condition or combination of conditions or a period of disability required by an employee’s mental or physical health or the health of the employee’s fetus which requires the care of a physician who provides a medical verification of the need for the employee’s absence from work for 60 or more work days. See N.J.S.A. 11A:6-5.1(a)4. N.J.S.A. 11A:6-5.1(a) (a)2 provides that an employee shall be eligible to receive donated leave time if the employee has exhausted all accrued sick, vacation and administrative leave, all sick leave injury benefits, if any, and all compensatory time off. See also, N.J.A.C. 4A:6-1.22.
While N.J.S.A. 11A:6-5.1 does not expressly provide for use of intermittent donated leave, the Commission has approved of its use in cases where the employee is returning to work from a prolonged absence related to the condition and has demonstrated the need for intermittent donated leave for a finite time period. See, In the Matter of J.R. (CSC, decided March 27, 2018) aff’d on reconsideration (CSC, decided October 3, 2018); cf. In the Matter of B.M. (CSC, decided March 28, 2018) (The Commission denied the appellant’s request for use of intermittent donated leave because he was not returning to work from a prolonged absence and his request was to use intermittent donated leave indefinitely.)
In the instant matter, the record reflects that while the appellant’s request for use of intermittent donated leave relates to an underlying illness for which she was previously permitted to participate in the DLP, it is clear that she is not returning to work from a prolonged absence. Moreover, her request to use donated leave intermittently is not for a finite period, but rather indefinitely. For the foregoing reasons, the appellant does not meet the criteria to participate in the DLP and her appeal is denied.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be denied.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
1 The DLP was added to Title 11A, effective June 21, 2019.
Decisions this one cites
- In the Matter of J.R. (March 27, 2018)
- In the Matter of B.M. (March 28, 2018)
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.