Fire Prevention Specialist (M05G66U), CSC Docket No. 2020-1594
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 12, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2020-1594: certification or appointment, ordered. In In the Matter of Fire Prevention Specialist (M0566U), Ridgewood (CSC decided August 16, 2017), the Civil Service Commission (Commission) granted the request of Ridgewood for
Commission decisions · Meeting of February 12, 2020
In In the Matter of Fire Prevention Specialist (M0566U), Ridgewood (CSC decided August 16, 2017), the Civil Service Commission (Commission) granted the request of Ridgewood for an appointment waiver from the December 21, 2016 certification (OL161454) for Fire Prevention Specialist (M0566U), Ridgewood and ordered that no selection costs be assessed at that time since there was a possibility that the list could be utilized prior to its expiration. The appointing authority did not utilize the subject eligible list and the matter of the assessment of the costs is now before the Commission.
- Matter
- Certification or appointment
- Decided
- February 12, 2020, item B-45
- Outcome
- Ordered
- Title
- FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST
- Examination
- M0566U
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-045 02-12-20.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed the appointing authority be assessed selection costs in the amount of $2,048 and the matter of the classification of Firefighter positions in the Fire Prevention Bureau be referred to Agency Services for review.
The decision
CSC published this decision as a scanned image. The text below was recognized by OCR, read twice and checked against the meeting minutes, but OCR can misread a word. The official document is the record.
eee
In fn the Matter of Fire Prevention Specialist (M0566U), Ridgewood (CSC, decided August 16, 2017), the Civil Service Commission (Commission) granted the request of the Ridgewood for an appointment waiver from the December 21, 2016 certification (OL161454) for Fire Prevention Specialist (MO566U), Ridgewood and ordered that no selection costs were to be assessed at that time Since there was a possibility that the list could be utilized prior to its expiration. A copy of that decision is attached hereto and incorporated herein. However, the appointing authority did not utilize the subject eligible list and the matter of the assessment of costs is now before the Commission.
The pertinent facts of this matter are contained in In the Matter of Fire Prevention Specialist, supra. However, the certification was cancelled, and no appointments were made. Therefore, Ridgewood was notified that since the eligible list was not utilized by its expiration date, the matter of the costs for the selection process in the amount of $2,048 would be forwarded to the Commission for a determination. In reply, Ridgewood states that it should not have to pay costs as it separated the provisional employee, David Yaden, on June 1, 2016 prior to the issuance of the list on December 15, 2016. Specifically, it explains that Ridgewood had two rounds of personnel layoffs in 2010. Instead of laying off paid Fire Fighters, “Fire Inspectors” (Firefighters) were put back to work in a platoon, instead of | having them work separately in the Fire Prevention Bureau. In doing so, it was necessary to hire part-time personnel, Yaden, a retired Deputy Fire Chief, to get the fire inspections completed. Ridgewood returned the “Fire Inspectors” to the Fire Prevention Bureau in the spring of 2016 and separated Yaden on June 1, 2016, as it could no longer afford his position. Nonctheless, his separation was not recorded until March 21, 2017. Ridgewood argues that there is no need to hire Fire Prevention Specialists, and it has not used that title since 2016 and has no plans to use it.
CONCLUSION
NUS.A. 11A4-5 and NAC. 44:10-2.2(a)2 state that if an appointing authority receives permission not to make an appointment, it can be ordered to reimburse the costs of the selection process. While administering examinations and providing the names of eligible job candidates to the jurisdictions under the Civil Service system are two of the primary activities of this agency, these costly efforts are thwarted when appointing authorities fail to utilize the resulting eligible lists to make appointments and candidates have needlessly expended their time, effort and money to take these examinations in hopes of being considered for a permanent appointment. The amount of $2,048 has been determined to be the cost of the selection process for open-competitive examinations for local government positions. In the instant situation, although the appointing authority had shown a valid reason for not making an appointment from the stbject eligible list, it failed to provide a sufficient basis for not being charged for the costs of the selection process which produced the subject eligible list.
In this regard. the appointing authority did not notify the Civil Service Commission of Yaden’s separation from service in a timely manner. Yaden remained in a provisional position pending open-competitive examination for almost five years, nine months, from September 6, 2010 to June 1, 2016. On August 1, 2016 an examination for Fire Prevention Specialist (M0566), Ridgewood, was announced with a closing date of August 25, 2016, and still Ridgewood did not communicate Yaden’s separation from service. An eligible list was promulgated in on December 15, 2016, with an expiration date of December 14, 2019, and Ridgewood did not update Yaden’s County and Municipal Personnel System (CAMPS) record. The certification (OL161454) was issued on December 21, 2016, with the required disposition date of March 21, 2017. On that date, Yaden’s separation from service was recorded with an effective date of June 1, 2016 was a note indicating that Ridgewood has discontinued the use of Fire Prevention Specialists. Nonetheless, Ridgewood did not return the certification.
Although the Commission is sympathetic to the budgetary constraints faced by the appointing authority at the time, those constraints were in 2010, over six ! years prior to the issuance of the list, and the appointing authority has not provided any documentation in support of its claims. Additionally, the appointing authority did not properly record Yaden’s separation from service in a timely fashion, but did so on the certification’s (OL161454) due date, and did not return the certification after repeated notifications. The appointing authority's claim is that it was working
Firefighters out-of-title in investigations, and had to return them to proper duties during a 2010 layoff, when they hired Yaden. Over five years later, they returned the Firefighters to out-of-title duties and separated Yaden from service shortly thereafter. This situation warrants a classification review of Firefighter positions in the Fire Prevention Bureau. Also, it is appropriate that the appointing authority be assessed the costs of the selection process.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that the appointing authority be assessed the costs of the selection process in the amount of $2,018 to be paid within 30 days of the issuance of this decision, and the matter of the classification of Firefighter positions in the Fire Prevention Bureau be referred to Agency Services for review.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
Decisions this one cites
- Matter of Fire Prevention Specialist (M0566U), Ridgewood (August 16, 2017)
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it by OCR and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.