NJ Civil Service Navigator

Alberto Rodriguez, CSC Docket No. 2020-2307

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of September 2, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2020-2307: matter, granted. Alberto Rodriguez requests that the eligible list for Police Officer (S9999U), City of Passaic, be revived so that his name may be certified to the appointing authority.

Commission decisions · Meeting of September 2, 2020

Alberto Rodriguez requests that the eligible list for Police Officer (S9999U), City of Passaic, be revived so that his name may be certified to the appointing authority.

Matter
Not classified
Decided
September 2, 2020, item B-5
Outcome
Granted
Title
POLICE OFFICER
Employer
Passaic City
Examination
S9999U
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-005 09-02-20.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

Appellant's argumentAlberto Rodriguez requests that the eligible list for Police Officer (S9999U), City of Passaic, be revived so that his name may be certified to the appointing authority.

BackgroundThe subject eligible list promulgated on March 29, 2017 and expired on May 1, 2020.1 The appellant’s name appeared as the seventh ranked non-veteran eligible on the August 20, 2019 certification (OL190996) of the subject eligible list. The appointing authority returned the certification for disposition on January 16, 2020, and indicated that the appellant was to be retained as “Interested, future certifications only.” In an August 25, 2019 letter to the appointing authority, the appellant indicated that while he was interested in the position of Police Officer, he needed to “delay [his] acceptance again due to active duty military status” as he was “currently still deployed overseas.” The appellant further explained that he was attaching his “resume for consideration of the position that is being offered.” The appellant noted that his expected date of return to the United States was January 2020.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant asserts that he was deployed oversees at the time of the certification, but that he anticipated continuing the process of becoming a Police Officer. The appellant requests that he continue the process that he was not effectively able to pursue during the time of his deployment.

1 The expiration date was extended until the new Law Enforcement Examination (S9999A) eligible list promulgated on May 15, 2020.

Appointing authority's argumentIn response, the appointing authority does not object to the appellant’s restoration to the subject eligible list for future consideration.

CONCLUSION

N.J.S.A. 11A:4-6 and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-3.4 provide that an eligible list may be revived in order to implement a court order or decision of the Civil Service Commission (Commission) in the event of a successful appeal instituted during the life of a list, to correct an administrative error, or for other good cause. In the instant matter, the appellant requests to continue the process that he was unable to pursue as he was deployed oversees on active military duty. The appointing authority does not object to the appellant’s restoration to the eligible list for future consideration. The Commission agrees that the appellant should be given an opportunity to be considered for appointment upon his return from active military duty.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this request be granted and that the list for Police Officer (S9999U), City of Passaic be revived, in order that the appellant may be considered for appointment at the time of the next certification, for prospective employment opportunities only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.