B.J.S., CSC Docket No. 2020-2389
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 17, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2020-2389: removal from an eligible list, denied. B.J.S., represented by Michelle J. Douglas, Esq., and Phillip S. Burnham, II, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Fire Fighter candidate by the City of Pleasantville and its reque
Commission decisions · Meeting of February 17, 2021
B.J.S., represented by Michelle J. Douglas, Esq., and Phillip S. Burnham, II, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Fire Fighter candidate by the City of Pleasantville and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Fire Fighter (M1867W) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
- Matter
- Removal from an eligible list
- Decided
- February 17, 2021, item B-2
- Outcome
- Denied
- Stated ground
- Psychological evaluation
- Title
- FIRE FIGHTER
- Examination
- M1867W
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-002 02-17-21.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
This docket at the Commission
- October 21, 2020, item B-16Referred for further reviewThe Civil Service Commission directed that the appellant be referred for an independent psychological evaluation.
- February 17, 2021, item B-2DeniedThe Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
The decision
BackgroundB.J.S., represented by Michelle J. Douglas, Esq. and Phillip S. Burnham, II, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Fire Fighter candidate by the City of Pleasantville and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Fire Fighter (M1867W) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
This appeal was referred for independent evaluation by the Civil Service
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.