Catherine Zuidema, CSC Docket No. 2020-2552
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 16, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2020-2552: working test period, dismissed. Catherine Zuidema, Human Services Specialist 1, Monmouth County, Department of Human Resources, release at the end of the working test period, effective April 20, 2020.
Commission decisions · Meeting of February 16, 2022
Catherine Zuidema, Human Services Specialist 1, Monmouth County, Department of Human Resources, release at the end of the working test period, effective April 20, 2020.
- Matter
- Working test period
- Decided
- February 16, 2022, item A-4
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- ALJ's recommendation
- Dismiss the appeal for failure to appear.
- Title
- HUMAN SERVICES SPECIALIST 1
- Employer
- Monmouth County
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (A004 ZUIDEMA CATHERINE.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Commission affirmed the dismissal of the appeal for failure to appear.
The decision
CSC published this decision as a scanned image. The text below was recognized by OCR, read twice and checked against the meeting minutes, but OCR can misread a word. The official document is the record.
BackgroundThe appeal of Catherine Zuidema, Human Services Specialist 1, Monmouth County, Department of Human Resources, release at the end of the working test period, effective April 20, 2020, was heard by Administrative Law Judge Judith Lieberman (ALJ), who rendered her initial decision on January 25, 2022, 2021. No exceptions were filed.
AnalysisHaving considered the record and the ALJ’s initia] decision, and having made an independent evaluation of the record, the Civil Service Commission, at its meeting of February 16, 2022, accepted and adopted the Conclusion as contained in the attached ALJ’s initial decision.
ORDER
The Civil Service Commission dismisses the appeal based on the appellant’s failure to appear.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it by OCR and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.