LaToya Harris, CSC Docket No. 2020-2669
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of July 17, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2020-2669: matter, granted in part. LaToya Harris requests to have her application for Parole Officer Recruit, Bilingual in Spanish and English (S1001A), Statewide applied to Parole Officer Recruit (S1000A), Statewide.
Commission decisions · Meeting of July 17, 2020
LaToya Harris requests to have her application for Parole Officer Recruit, Bilingual in Spanish and English (S1001A), Statewide applied to Parole Officer Recruit (S1000A), Statewide.
A note on the record.
The minutes print CSC Docket No. 2020-2723 for this matter and for another matter at this meeting. This page uses the docket printed on the decision itself, 2020-2669.
- Matter
- Not classified
- Decided
- July 17, 2020, item B-2
- Outcome
- Granted in part
- Title
- PAROLE OFFICER RECRUIT
- Examination
- S1001A, S1000A
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-002 07-17-20.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be granted in part.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundLaToya Harris requests to have her application for Parole Officer Recruit, Bilingual in Spanish and English (S1001A), Statewide applied to Parole Officer Recruit (S1000A), Statewide.
The examination at issue was announced with requirements that had to be met as of the June 21, 2019 closing date. Applications needed to be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the closing date. Agency records indicate that nearly 1,200 candidates applied for the subject examination. Certification OS200192 has been issued and its disposition is due November 15, 2020. The list expires on May 14, 2021.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the petitioner states that she accidentally submitted her application for Parole Officer Recruit, Bilingual in Spanish and English (S1001A) instead of Parole Officer Recruit (S1000A). She presents that she was unaware that there were two separate examination and she does not speak Spanish. She states that she realized her mistake when she learned that other candidates started to receive application packets from the State Parole Board, and she did not. The petitioner asserts that she has been waiting for the opportunity to become a Parole Officer Recruit for several years, she received a 98.6 on the Law Enforcement Examination, and she has been working hard to put herself in the best position to become a Parole Officer Recruit. Therefore, the petitioner requests that either her application for the (S1001A) examination be applied to the (S1000A) examination, or she be allowed to submit an application for the (S1000A) examination after the closing date.
CONLCUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(e) provides that applications must be filed no later than the announced filing deadline. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) may relax a rule for good cause in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisIn this matter, the petitioner asserts that she mistakenly applied for the Parole Officer Recruit, Bilingual in Spanish and English (S1001A), Statewide examination when she meant to apply for the Parole Officer Recruit (S1000A), Statewide examination as she did not realize that there were two separate examinations and she does not speak Spanish. The Commission notes that the dual purpose of the Civil Service system is to ensure efficient public service for State and local governments and to provide appointment and advancement opportunities to Civil Service employees based on their merit and abilities. These interests are best served when more, rather than fewer, individuals are presented with employment opportunities. See Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel, 154 N.J. 121 (1998). Further, there are nearly 1,200 applicants and multiple vacancies are anticipated for the subject title, so the candidate pool will not be significantly impacted by allowing another candidate to file. Under these circumstances, the Commission finds that, for equitable reasons, the petitioner should be allowed to apply for the subject examination. Therefore, the Commission finds that there is good cause to relax N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(e) and to allow the petitioner to submit her application and application fee after the closing deadline for prospective employment opportunities only. However, the petitioner’s request to apply her application from the S1001A examination to the S1000A examination is denied.
This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this petition be granted in part, and LaToya Harris be permitted to submit an application for the Parole Officer Recruit (S1000A), Statewide, examination. It is further ordered that Ms. Harris submit an open competitive application and the $35.00 application processing fee to the Division of Agency Services. The application and processing fee must be postmarked no later than 15 days from the issuance date of this decision. Upon receipt of the application and processing fee, it is ordered that her application be processed. Finally, if Ms. Harris’ application and the required payment are not postmarked on or before the 15th day after the issuance date of this decision, she will not be entitled to have an application for the subject examination processed.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
Decisions this one cites
- Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel 154 N.J. 121
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.