Brandon Durant, CSC Docket No. 2020-2736
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of June 29, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2020-2736: discipline, dismissed. Brandon Durant, Stable Worker, Union County, Department of Parks and Recreation, removal, effective January 21, 2020, on charges of violation of County policy related to drug and alcohol abuse.
Commission decisions · Meeting of June 29, 2022
Brandon Durant, Stable Worker, Union County, Department of Parks and Recreation, removal, effective January 21, 2020, on charges of violation of County policy related to drug and alcohol abuse.
- Matter
- Discipline
- Decided
- June 29, 2022, item A-2
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- ALJ's recommendation
- Dismiss the appeal for failure to appear.
- What the Commission did with it
- Adopted the ALJ's recommendation
- Penalty appealed
- removal
- Employer
- Union County
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (A002 DURANT BRANDON.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission affirmed the recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge.
The decision
CSC published this decision as a scanned image. The text below was recognized by OCR, read twice and checked against the meeting minutes, but OCR can misread a word. The official document is the record.
BackgroundThe appeal of Brandon Durant, Stable Worker, Union County, Department of Parks and Recreation, removal, effective January 21, 2020, on charges, was heard by Administrative Law Judge Joann LaSala Candido (ALJ), who rendered her initial decision on April 27, 2022. No exceptions were filed.
AnalysisHaving considered the record and the ALJ’s initial decision, and having made an independent evaluation of the record, the Civil Service Commission, at its meeting of June 29, 2022, accepted the recommendation as contained in the attached ALJ’s initial decision.
ORDER
The Civil Service Commission dismisses the appeal of Brandon Durant for failure to appear.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it by OCR and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.