NJ Civil Service Navigator

Estefania Leon, CSC Docket No. 2020-316

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of September 10, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2020-316: examination eligibility, granted. Estefania Leon appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the experience requirements for the open- competitive examination for K

Commission decisions · Meeting of September 10, 2019

Estefania Leon appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the experience requirements for the open- competitive examination for Keyboarding Clerk 2 Bilingual in Spanish and English (M0130A), Millville.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
September 10, 2019, item B-37
Outcome
Granted
Title
KEYBOARDING CLERK 2
Employer
Millville City
Examination
M0130A
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-037 09-10-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundEstefania Leon appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the experience requirements for the open- competitive examination for Keyboarding Clerk 2 Bilingual in Spanish and English (M0130A), Millville.

The examination had a closing date of January 22, 2019 and was open to residents of Millville City, and to Cumberland County, who possessed one year of experience operating an alphanumeric keyboard or typewriter to produce documents such as letters, memos, reports, charts, forms and other materials. Successful completion of a clerical training program with a minimum of 700 clerical training hours or 30 semester hour credits in secretarial science from an accredited college or university could be substituted for the experience. The appellant was found to be below minimum requirements in experience. As there were no admitted candidates, the examination was cancelled on July 22, 2019.

On her application, the appellant listed three positions, Keyboarding Clerk 2 Bilingual in Spanish and English, Associate with Lane Bryant, and Violation Clerk (part-time, 24 hours per week) with CS Regional Municipal Court1. She was credited with three months in her provisional position and two months in her Violation Clerk position, prorated. Her Associate duties at a retail clothes store were inapplicable. Therefore, she was found to be lacking seven months of experience.

1 Cumberland Salem Regional Municipal Court.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant states that she can speak English and Spanish, and can do the work of the title. She provides her tasks in her provisional position in the subject title.

CONCLUSION

N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b)(2) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive examination announcement by the closing date.

In the present matter, the appellant was required to possess one year of experience and she received full credit for her experience in the first and third positions on her application. Her second position was clearly inapplicable. Nonetheless, the subject examination is non-competitive, with no eligibles. The appellant is still serving as a provisional appointee and she has accrued more than seven months of additional full-time experience since the closing date in January 2019. Based on the particular circumstances presented, good cause has been established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) to accept the appellant’s additional experience beyond the closing date and admit her to the examination.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, the examination cancellation be rescinded, and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective appointment opportunities only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.