NJ Civil Service Navigator

Code Enforcement Officer (M0424V), CSC Docket No. 2020-749

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of December 18, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2020-749: request for enforcement, ordered. The appointing authority’s failure to dispose of the certification for Code Enforcement Officer (M0424V), City of Newark, while provisional appointees were serving in the title, has

Commission decisions · Meeting of December 18, 2019

The appointing authority’s failure to dispose of the certification for Code Enforcement Officer (M0424V), City of Newark, while provisional appointees were serving in the title, has been referred to the Civil Service Commission for enforcement.

Matter
Request for enforcement
Decided
December 18, 2019, item B-26
Outcome
Ordered
Title
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
Employer
Newark
Examination
M0424V
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-026 12-18-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission ordered the appointing authority to remove the provisional appointees, make an appointment from the certification, and pay compliance costs in the amount of $1,000.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

The appointing authority’s failure to dispose of the certification for Code Enforcement Officer (M0424V), City of Newark, while provisional appointees were serving in the title, has been referred to the Civil Service Commission (Commission) for enforcement.

AnalysisThe Commission has reviewed the salary disapproval issued against the salary of Regina Woodson and Foster Shakeemah and has made the following findings of fact:

1. Regina Woodson and Foster Shakeemah are currently serving provisionally in the title of Code Enforcement Officer.

2. There is a vacancy for the title of Code Enforcement Officer, and an outstanding certification was issued on May 21, 2018 from the M0424V eligible list.

3. The certification has not been properly disposed of and the appointing authority was advised of the required date of disposition.

4. The Certification Manager issued a Notice of Salary Disapproval to the appointing authority and afforded it an opportunity to appeal such action to the Commission.

5. No such appeal was taken, and no proper disposition of the certification was received; the salary disapproval, therefore, became a final administrative action.

6. By not properly disposing of this certification, the appointing authority is in violation of Civil Service law and rules.

In the instant matter, the appointing authority has refused to properly dispose of the certification issued to fill the vacancy occupied by a provisional employee. The appointing authority has not contested or appealed the findings of the Certification Manager. The payment of salary for which there is a salary disapproval is illegal and contravenes Civil Service law and rules.

The appointing authority, despite being given the opportunity, did not submit any arguments or documentation for the Commission’s review.

ORDER

The Commission orders the appointing authority to immediately dispose of the outstanding certification by making a permanent appointment of a reachable and interested eligible.1 Additionally, the appointing authority is ordered to immediately separate any employee serving provisionally pending open competitive examination procedures in the subject title who does not receive an appointment from the outstanding certification. Such disposition must be filed with the Certification Manager on or before 30 days from the issuance of this order. If no proper disposition is made within this time period, the Commission orders the constructive appointment of the highest ranked interested eligible. See N.J.A.C. 4A:10-2.1(a)3; In the Matter of Battalion Fire Chief (PM1640E), Deputy Fire Chief (PM1423H), Atlantic City, Docket No. A-229-87T7 (App. Div. December 8, 1988).

The Commission further orders that the costs incurred in the compliance process be assessed against the appointing authority in the amount of $1,000, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 11A:10-3 and N.J.A.C. 4A:10-3.2(a)5, to be remitted within 30 days of the issuance of this order. In the event the appointing authority fails to make a good faith effort to fully comply with this order within this time frame, it is additionally ordered that fines be assessed in the amount of $100 per day, beginning on the 31ST day following the issuance of this order and continuing each day of continued violation, up to a maximum of $10,000.00. See N.J.S.A. 11A:10-3; N.J.A.C. 4A:10-2.1(a)2; In the Matter of Fiscal Analyst (M1351H), Highlands,

1 The first ranked veteran eligible, Elmore Gaines, has appealed his non-appointment. However, agency records indicate that Mr. Gaines was removed as a Code Enforcement Officer with Newark, effective September 3, 2013. See In the Matter of Elmore Gaines (CSC, decided July 30, 2014) (Reconsideration denied, February 4, 2015). Therefore, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.1(a)5, Newark may remove his name from the eligible list on that basis.

Docket No. A-4347-87T3 (App. Div. February 2, 1989). This matter will be referred to the Office of the Attorney General for enforcement and for recovery of illegal payments and fines as assessed herein if full compliance is not effected within 30 days.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

  • In the Matter of Battalion Fire Chief (PM1640E), Deputy Fire Chief (PM1423H), Atlantic City Docket No. A-229-87T7 (December 8, 1988)
  • In the Matter of Elmore Gaines (July 30, 2014)

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.