Linda McFadden, CSC Docket No. 2020-785
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of October 23, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2020-785: examination eligibility, granted. Linda McFadden appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examinati
Commission decisions · Meeting of October 23, 2019
Linda McFadden appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination for Library Director (M0251A), Bridgeton.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- October 23, 2019, item B-51
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- LIBRARY DIRECTOR
- Employer
- Bridgeton
- Examination
- M0251A
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-051 10-23-19.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundLinda McFadden appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination for Library Director (M0251A), Bridgeton.
The subject examination had a closing date of March 7, 2019 and was open to residents of Bridgeton, and Cumberland County, who met the announced requirements. These requirements included graduation from an accredited college or university with a Master’s degree in Library or Information Science in a library program accredited by the American Library Association or from a New Jersey college Master’s program in Library Science that has been deemed acceptable by Thomas Edison State College, and five years of library experience including work in the service, circulation, and reference areas, two years of which shall have been in a supervisory capacity. The appellant was found to be ineligible based on a lack of experience. As there were no admitted applicants, the examination was canceled on September 18, 2019.
Appellant's argumentThe appellant indicated possession of a Master’s degree in Library and Information Science and she listed five positions on her application and resume: provisional Library Director, Librarian I, Librarian, Librarian, and Circulation Assistant. She was credited with more than ten years of general experience, and with one year, seven months of supervisory experience. As such, she was found to be lacking five months of supervisory experience. She remains in her provisional position.
On appeal, the appellant states that she is a provisional Library Director, and she provides some duties of her position. She also indicates that she has been working in libraries for twenty years.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive examination announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) provides that an application may only be amended prior to the announced closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission may relax a rule for good cause in particular situations, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisInitially, Agency Services’ determination is correct as the appellant lacked the required amount of supervisory experience. Nonetheless, the examination was cancelled, the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the title under test, and she has at least two years of supervisory experience since her provisional appointment in August 2017. Based on the circumstances presented, good cause has been established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) to accept the appellant’s additional provisional experience beyond the closing date and admit her to the examination.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, the examination cancellation be rescinded, and the appellant’s application be processed.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.