Senior Claims Adjudicator Specialist, CSC Docket No. 2021-1155
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of March 3, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2021-1155: matter, granted. The Department of Labor and Workforce Development requests permission not to make appointments from three certifications (PS210066, PS210067 and PS210068), of the list for Senior Claims Adjudicator Spec
Commission decisions · Meeting of March 3, 2021
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development requests permission not to make appointments from three certifications (PS210066, PS210067 and PS210068), of the list for Senior Claims Adjudicator Specialist, Disability Determinations (PS8407N), Department of Labor and Workforce Development.
- Matter
- Not classified
- Decided
- March 3, 2021, item B-1
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- SENIOR CLAIMS ADJUDICATOR SPECIALIST DISABILITY DETERMINATIONS
- Employer
- Labor
- Examination
- PS8407N, PS8047N
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-001 03-03-21 AWG 21-1155, 21-1156, 21-1157.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission granted the appointment waiver and deferred selection costs.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundThe Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DOL) requests permission not to make appointments from three certifications (PS210066, PS210067 and PS210068), of the list for Senior Claims Adjudicator Specialist, Disability Determinations (PS8407N), DOL. The certifications are as follows:
The three certifications were issued to DOL on December 26, 2020. It returned the three certifications on February 2, 2021, and requested waivers of the appointment requirement. It indicated that it was the intention of the DOL to certify the Senior Claims Adjudicator, Disability Determinations list. Due to similarity in titles and human error, the Senior Claims Adjudicator Specialist, Disability Determinations list was certified. Once the error was caught, a request was made to cancel the certification, which was denied. It stated that it is unable to currently use the list generated from this symbol as it does not have approved vacancies for the title. The current approved vacancies are based on current operational needs and are for Senior Claims Adjudicator, Disability Determinations. It stated that it intends to appoint from the list in the future prior to expiration. Accordingly, it requested a waiver of the appointment requirement as well as a waiver of any selection costs.
The appointing authority’s request for an appointment waiver was acknowledged, and it was advised that if its request were granted, it could be assessed for the costs of the selection process in the amount of $1,602.
It is noted that there are currently no employees serving provisionally pending open competitive examination procedures in the subject titles with the appointing authority.
CONCLUSION
In accordance with N.J.S.A. 11A:4-5, once the examination process has been initiated due to the appointment of a provisional employee or due to an appointing authority’s request for a list to fill a vacancy, the appointing authority must make an appointment from the resulting eligible list if there are three or more interested and eligible candidates. The only exception to this mandate may be made by the Civil Service Commission for a valid reason such as fiscal constraints.
In the instant matters, the list was apparently certified in error. Once the error was caught, a request was made to cancel the certifications. Moreover, while the DOL states that it cannot make current appointments from the list, it intends to appoint from the Senior Claims Adjudicator Specialist, Disability Determinations list in the future. Under these circumstances, the appointing authority has presented adequate justification for granting the appointment waivers.
Although the appointment waivers are granted, both N.J.S.A. 11A:4-5 and N.J.A.C. 4A:10-2.2(a)2 state that if an appointing authority receives permission not to make an appointment, it can be ordered to reimburse the costs of the selection process. While administering examinations and providing the names of eligible job candidates to the jurisdictions under the Civil Service system are two of the primary activities of this agency, these costly efforts are thwarted when appointing authorities fail to utilize the resulting eligible lists to make appointments and candidates have needlessly expended their time, effort and money to take these examinations in hopes of being considered for a permanent appointment. The appointing authority indicates that is was the intention of the DOL to certify the Senior Claims Adjudicator, Disability Determinations list. Moreover, it states that it intends to appoint from the list in the future prior to expiration. Accordingly, it is appropriate to not assess selection costs at this time.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that these requests for waiver of the appointment requirement be granted and no selection costs be currently assessed. The costs will be re-examined after the expiration of the list.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.