Brian Albertson, CSC Docket No. 2021-1257
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of April 7, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2021-1257: examination eligibility, granted. Brian Albertson appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination
Commission decisions · Meeting of April 7, 2021
Brian Albertson appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination for Drafting Technician/Public Works Inspector (C0504B), Burlington County.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- April 7, 2021, item B-15
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- DRAFTING TECHNICIAN, PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
- Employer
- Burlington County
- Examination
- C0504B
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-015 04-07-21 EG.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundBrian Albertson appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination for the “dual” title Drafting Technician/Public Works Inspector (C0504B), Burlington County.
The subject examination had a closing date of April 6, 2020 and was open to residents of Burlington County who met the announced requirement. This requirement was one year of experience in the construction or installation of roads, water mains, sewer lines, or similar public works construction activities involving the reading and interpretation of blueprints, plans, specifications, and engineering drawings or surveying techniques directly related to public works construction. The appellant was found to be ineligible based on a lack of experience. As there were no admitted applicants, the examination was canceled on March 10, 2021.
On his application, the appellant indicated possession of a Bachelor’s degree and listed four positions on his application, Civil Engineer Trainee from November 2019 to March 2020; Laborer/TCC/Foreman with Work Zone Contractors from June 2017 to September 2019; Laborer with RE Pierson Construction from September 2011 to June 2016; and Laborer/Foreman with highway Safety Systems, Inc. from May 2005 to September 2010. Official records indicate that the appellant was provisionally appointed as a Drafting Technician/Public Works Inspector in February 2020, and prior to that was a Civil Engineer Trainee from December 2019 to February 2020, and a Truck Driver from November 2019 to December 2019. He was credited with five months of experience in the first position listed on his application, and was found to be lacking seven months of applicable experience.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant states that he has worked in the construction industry for 16 years, particularly in heavy highway construction. He lists some duties performed as a Laborer and Foreman, and submits a resume with additional positions listed.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive examination announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) provides that an application may only be amended prior to the announced closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission may relax a rule for good cause in particular situations, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisInitially, the appellant was correctly found ineligible for the subject examination. He was credited with five months of experience in his Civil Engineer Trainee position, time which included his provisional experience. His remaining experience was not qualifying, as it did not have the announced experience requirement as the primary focus. However, the examination was cancelled, the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the title under test, and he has accrued at least an additional seven months of experience since the April 2020 closing date. Based on the circumstances presented, good cause has been established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4- 2.1(f) and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) to accept the appellant’s additional provisional experience beyond the closing date and admit him to the examination.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, the examination cancellation be rescinded, and the appellant’s application be processed.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.