NJ Civil Service Navigator

MARCUS HALE, CSC Docket No. 2021-1728

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of July 21, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2021-1728: examination eligibility, granted. Marcus A. Hale, appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that he did not meet the experience requirement for the open competitive examination for H

Commission decisions · Meeting of July 21, 2021

Marcus A. Hale, appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that he did not meet the experience requirement for the open competitive examination for Housing Inspector (M0473B), City of Trenton.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
July 21, 2021, item B-31
Outcome
Granted
Title
HOUSING INSPECTOR
Employer
Trenton
Examination
M0473B
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-031 07-21-21 corrected by DL EG.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundMarcus A. Hale,1 appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that he did not meet the experience requirement for the open competitive examination for Housing Inspector (M0473B), City of Trenton.

By way of background, the announcement for the subject examination was issued on March 15, 2020 and was open to candidates who met the residency requirement and who possessed one year of experience in building inspection, building repair, building maintenance, construction, construction inspection, and/or other work concerned with building structures and/or building repair as of the April 6, 2020 closing date. Successful completion of a course in Principles of Housing Inspection could be substituted for six months of experience. It is noted that only one applicant was found eligible and the resulting eligible list promulgated on March 18, 2021 and expires on March 17, 2024. A certification (OL210232)) was issued on March 22, 2021. Agency Records reflect that the certification was returned to the Civil Service Commission (Commission) on June 10, 2021, with no appointment made by the appointing authority since the only eligible was interested in future certifications only.

On his application and resume, the appellant listed he served as a Sewer Repair Man with the City of Trenton from October 2019 to January 2020; a Truck Driver from June 2017 to October 2017 with Vietnam Veterans of America and a

1 Agency records indicate that the appellant was appointed provisionally pending open competitive examination procedures effective January 6, 2020.

Package Receiver from November 2014 to December 2014 with Amazon.2 Agency Services credited the appellant with three months of experience he gained provisionally in the subject title from January 2020 to April 2020. Therefore, it was determined that he lacked nine months of applicable experience as of the closing date.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal to the Commission, the appellant indicates that he began his employment with the City of Trenton as a Housing Inspector on January 6, 2020 and he has now been in the position for over one year. Therefore, he requests admittance to the subject examination.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b)2 provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive examination announcement by the closing date. However, N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Commission may relax a rule for good cause in particular situations, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.

AnalysisIn this matter, Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant was ineligible for the subject examination because he did not meet the one year of required experience as of the April 6, 2020 closing date. The appellant’s work experiences listed on his application and resume prior to his provisional experience as a Housing Inspector were deemed to be inapplicable as there were no indications of experiences in building inspection, repair, maintenance, construction or construction inspection. However, the appellant has been serving provisionally as a Housing Inspector with the appointing authority since January 2020.

Thus, the Commission finds that, for examination eligibility purposes, the appellant has been performing the duties of the title under test since January 2020. Therefore, he now possesses enough applicable experience based on this service. Moreover, absent accepting the appellant’s provisional experience after the closing date, no other eligible candidate can be appointed as there is an incomplete list of less than three interested eligibles for the position. In this regard, the purpose of the Civil Service system is best served when more rather than fewer individuals are presented with appointments and/or advancement opportunities. See Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel, 154 N.J. 121 (1998).

Under these circumstances, good cause exists to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b)2 and accept the appellant’s provisional experience after the closing date for examination eligibility purposes and admit him to the examination.

2 Agency records indicate that the appellant began his employment with the City of Trenton as a temporary Laborer 1 from August 2016 to January 2017. He then received a regular appointment to that title in October 2017. Subsequently, he served as a Sewer Repairer 1 from December 2018 to January 2020.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

  • Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel 154 N.J. 121

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.