Felicia Ojolo, CSC Docket No. 2021-50
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of September 30, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2021-50: examination scoring or administration, granted. The Department of Corrections requests that the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:6- 3.4(a), which govern the time in which employees must file an application for Supplemental
Commission decisions · Meeting of September 30, 2020
The Department of Corrections requests that the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:6- 3.4(a), which govern the time in which employees must file an application for Supplemental Compensation on Retirement (SCOR), be relaxed to permit Felicia Ojolo, a former Senior Correctional Police Officer, to submit a late application for SCOR benefits.
- Matter
- Examination scoring or administration
- Decided
- September 30, 2020, item B-17
- Outcome
- Granted
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-017 09-30-20.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundThe Department of Corrections (Corrections) requests that the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.4(a), which govern the time in which employees must file an application for Supplemental Compensation on Retirement (SCOR), be relaxed to permit Felicia Ojolo, a former Senior Correctional Police Officer, to submit a late application for SCOR benefits.
By way of background, Ojolo retired from State service, effective February 28, 2019. In an April 27, 2020 letter, the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) informed Corrections that Ojolo’s application for SCOR was being returned as the application was not filed within one year of the effective date of retirement.
Appellant's argumentIn its request to the Civil Service Commission (Commission) on Ojolo’s behalf, Corrections states that an investigation into the matter revealed that the delay in submitting Ojolo’s SCOR application to this agency, which resulted in the denial of payment, was a direct result of an administrative error made by its human resources department. It presents that Ojolo submitted her application to human resources in a timely manner. Therefore, the appointing authority fully supports the payment of these benefits to Ojolo.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.3(a) provides that, upon retirement, an employee is entitled to SCOR to be “computed at the rate of one-half the employee’s daily rate of pay for each day of earned and unused accumulated sick leave at the effective date of retirement.” N.J.A.C. 4A:6-3.4(a) provides that an employee may file an application for SCOR within one year of the effective date of retirement. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Commission may relax a rule for good cause in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisIn the instant matter, Ojolo retired from State service effective, February 28, 2019. Although her SCOR application was not received by this agency until after February 28, 2020, the appointing authority indicates that Ojolo submitted her SCOR application to its human resources department in a timely fashion. However, due to an administrative error, its human resources department did not submit her application to this agency within the one-year timeframe. Therefore, due to the appointing authority’s administrative error, the Commission finds good cause to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:6.3.4(a) and grant the request.
This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this request be granted.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.