G.M., CSC Docket No. 2022-1434
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of September 20, 2023, CSC Docket No. 2022-1434: removal from an eligible list, denied. G.M., represented by Valerie Palma DeLuisi, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Juvenile Detention Officer candidate by Morris County on the basis of psychological unfitness to p
Commission decisions · Meeting of September 20, 2023
G.M., represented by Valerie Palma DeLuisi, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Juvenile Detention Officer candidate by Morris County on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
- Matter
- Removal from an eligible list
- Decided
- September 20, 2023, item B-4
- Outcome
- Denied
- Stated ground
- Psychological evaluation
- Chair at the time
- Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
- Official decision
- CSC's PDF
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
The decision
BackgroundG.M., represented by Valerie Palma DeLuisi, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Juvenile Detention Officer candidate by Morris County Officer on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
This appeal was brought before the Medical Review Panel (Panel) on June 30, 2023, which rendered its Report and Recommendation on June 30, 2023. No exceptions were filed by the parties.
The report by the Panel discusses all submitted evaluations. The Panel concluded that the test results and procedures and the behavioral record, when viewed in light of the Job Specification for Juvenile Detention Officer, indicated that the appellant was psychologically unfit to perform effectively the duties of the position sought, and therefore, the action of the appointing authority should be upheld. Accordingly, the Panel recommended that the appellant be removed from consideration for the position.1
1 It is noted that the Juvenile Detention Officer title was reallocated to the noncompetitive division of the career service effective December 23, 2017. Therefore, in this instance, an eligible list need not be established.
CONCLUSION
The Job Specification for the title, Juvenile Detention Officer, is the official job description for such county positions within the Civil Service System. According to the specification, a Juvenile Detention Officer, under general direction of a supervisory employee during an assigned tour of duty, controls the general conduct and behavior of juvenile residents, the maintenance of discipline, and custodial, recreational, transportation, and housekeeping functions. The specification lists examples of work and the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary to perform the job. Examples include the ability to cope with crisis situations that occur in a juvenile detention facility; the ability to apply knowledge and use of sound judgment in critical situations; and the ability to write concise, accurate reports.
Having considered the record, including the Job Specification for Juvenile Detention Officer and the duties and abilities encompassed therein, and the Panel’s Report and Recommendation issued thereon, and having made an independent evaluation of the same, the Civil Service Commission accepts and adopts the findings and conclusions as contained in the Panel’s Report and Recommendation.
ORDER
The Civil Service Commission finds that the appointing authority has met its burden of proof that G.M. is psychologically unfit to perform effectively the duties of a Juvenile Detention Officer and, therefore, the Civil Service Commission denies his appeal.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.