NJ Civil Service Navigator

Accountant (C0607W), CSC Docket No. 2022-2073

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of May 18, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-2073: certification or appointment, ordered. In In the Matter of Accountant (C0607W), Union County (CSC decided September 25, 2019, the Civil Service Commission (Commission) granted the request of Union County for an appointme

Commission decisions · Meeting of May 18, 2022

In In the Matter of Accountant (C0607W), Union County (CSC decided September 25, 2019, the Civil Service Commission (Commission) granted the request of Union County for an appointment waiver for the January 24, 2019 certification and ordered that no selection costs would be assessed at that time since there was a possibility that the eligible list could be utilized prior to its expiration. However, the appointing authority did not utilize the subject eligible list and the matter of the assessment of costs is now before the Commission.

Matter
Certification or appointment
Decided
May 18, 2022, item B-40
Outcome
Ordered
Examination
C0607W
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-040 5-18-22 ENFCG.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission assessed selection costs in the amount of $2,048.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

In In the Matter of Accountant (C0607W), Union County (CSC decided September 25, 2019, the Civil Service Commission (Commission) granted the request of Union County for an appointment waiver for the January 24, 2019 certification and ordered that no selection costs would be assessed at that time since there was a possibility that the eligible list could be utilized prior to its expiration. A copy of that decision is attached hereto and incorporated herein. However, the appointing authority did not utilize the subject eligible list and the matter of the assessment of costs is now before the Commission.

BackgroundAgency records reveal that one certification was issued from the subject eligible list on January 24, 2019. However, the certification was cancelled on October 1, 2019 and no appointments were made. Therefore, Union County was notified that since the eligible list was not utilized by its expiration date, the matter of the costs for the selection process in the amount of $2,048 would be forwarded to the Commission for a determination. In response, the appointing authority stated that it “will be accepting the cost for the selection process.”

CONCLUSION

N.J.S.A. 11A:4-5 and N.J.A.C. 4A:10-2.2(a)2 state that if an appointing authority receives permission not to make an appointment, it can be ordered to reimburse the costs of the selection process. While administering examinations and providing the names of eligible job candidates to the jurisdictions under the Civil

Service system are two of the primary activities of this agency, these costly efforts are thwarted when appointing authorities fail to utilize the resulting eligible lists to make appointments and candidates have needlessly expended their time, effort and money to take these examinations in hopes of being considered for a permanent appointment. The amount of $2,048 has been determined to be the cost of the selection process for open-competitive examinations for local government positions.

In the instant situation, although the appointing authority had shown a valid reason for not making an appointment from the subject eligible list, it has not provided a sufficient basis for not being charged for the costs of the selection process which produced the subject eligible list, nor is it challenging the costs in this matter. In this regard, the examination for the subject title was generated based on the appointing authority’s need to fill a vacancy. However, after a complete certification was issued, the appointing authority requested an appointment waiver due to budgetary constraints. It also indicated that it planned on using the subject eligible list before it expired on January 23, 2022. However, agency records indicate that it failed to do so. Thus, based on the foregoing, it is appropriate that the appointing authority be assessed the costs of the selection process.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that Union County be assessed the costs of the selection process in the amount of $2,048 to be paid within 30 days of the issuance of this decision.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.