NJ Civil Service Navigator

Christy Matthews, CSC Docket No. 2022-2334

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of June 12, 2024, CSC Docket No. 2022-2334: working test period, penalty upheld. Christy Matthews, Keyboarding Clerk 1, Burlington County, Sheriff’s Department, release at the end of the working test period effective March 11, 2022.

Commission decisions · Meeting of June 12, 2024

Christy Matthews, Keyboarding Clerk 1, Burlington County, Sheriff’s Department, release at the end of the working test period effective March 11, 2022.

Matter
Working test period
Decided
June 12, 2024, item A-5
Outcome
Penalty upheld
ALJ's recommendation
Uphold the release at the end of the working test period.
What the Commission did with it
Adopted the ALJ's recommendation
Title
KEYBOARDING CLERK 1
Employer
Burlington County
Chair at the time
Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
Official decision
CSC's PDF

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission affirmed the recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge.

The decision

CSC published this decision as a scanned image. The text below was recognized by OCR, read twice and checked against the meeting minutes, but OCR can misread a word. The official document is the record.

BackgroundThe appeal of Christy Matthews, Keyboarding Clerk 1, Burlington County, Sheriff's Department, release at the end of the working test period, effective March 11, 2022, was heard by Administrative Law Judge William T. Cooper III (ALJ), who rendered his initial decision on May 3, 2024. Exceptions and a response to the reply were filed by the appellant, and a reply to the exceptions and a response were filed on behalf of the appointing authority.

AnalysisHaving considered the record and the attached ALJ’s initial decision, including a thorough review of the exceptions, replies, and responses, and having made an independent evaluation of the record, the Civil Service Commission (Commission), at its meeting on June 12, 2024, accepted and adopted the determinations contained in the ALJ’s initial decision and his recommendation to uphold the release at the end of the working test period.

Upon its de novo review of the ALJ’s initial decision as well as the entire record, including the exceptions filed by the appellant, the Commission agrees with the ALJ’s determinations. The Commission makes the following comments. The ALJ found that although the appellant blamed the lack of training she received from her supervisor, she failed to address the specific deficiencies contained in the work progress reports. The ALJ also addressed her lateness issues and how this was not a training matter. In her exceptions, the appellant does not substantively address these issues, but rather, she asks the Commission to now investigate complaints of other coworkers who may have had issues with her supervisor. The Commission notes that such issues should have been raised and addressed at the Office of Administrative Law. Regardless, as found by the ALJ, the appellant failed to establish a nexus between the lack of training and her actual mistakes.

Further, while the appointing authority objects to the Commission’s acceptance of the exceptions and a response to the reply to the exceptions, its arguments are unpersuasive. The Commission has previously indicated in other matters its interest in having a complete a record as possible absent any prejudice. See In the Mater of Robert Zorn, Jr., Mercer County Department of Human Services (MSB, decided April 5, 2006) (Untimely exceptions were accepted as they were received prior to the matter being considered and the appointing authority had an opportunity to respond). In the instant matter, the Commission finds no prejudice in accepting the exceptions and a response to the reply to the exceptions filed by the appellant. The appointing authority had the opportunity to respond.

ORDER

The Civil Service Commission finds that the action of the appointing authority in releasing the appellant at the end of the working test period was justified. The Commission therefore affirms that action and dismisses the appeal of Christy Matthews.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it by OCR and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.