N.R., CSC Docket No. 2022-2387
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of August 23, 2023, CSC Docket No. 2022-2387: removal from an eligible list, denied. N.R., represented by Christopher L. Perkes, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Fire Fighter candidate by Clifton and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Fire
Commission decisions · Meeting of August 23, 2023
N.R., represented by Christopher L. Perkes, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Fire Fighter candidate by Clifton and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Fire Fighter (M1813W) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
- Matter
- Removal from an eligible list
- Decided
- August 23, 2023, item B-1
- Outcome
- Denied
- Stated ground
- Psychological evaluation
- Title
- FIRE FIGHTER
- Examination
- M1813W
- Chair at the time
- Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
- Official decision
- CSC's PDF
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
This docket at the Commission
- May 24, 2023, item B-6Referred for further reviewThe Civil Service Commission directed that the appellant be referred for an independent psychological evaluation.
- August 23, 2023, item B-1DeniedThe Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
The decision
BackgroundN.R., represented by Christopher L. Perkes, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Fire Fighter candidate by Clifton and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Fire Fighter (M1813W) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
This appeal was referred for independent evaluation by the Civil Service
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.