Kevin Bagnell, CSC Docket No. 2022-2624
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of June 15, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-2624: examination scoring or administration, granted. Kevin Bagnell appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services which found that he lacked the required license for the promotional examination for Assistant Constru
Commission decisions · Meeting of June 15, 2022
Kevin Bagnell appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services which found that he lacked the required license for the promotional examination for Assistant Construction Official (PM5005C), Mount Laurel.
- Matter
- Examination scoring or administration
- Decided
- June 15, 2022, item B-14
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- ASSISTANT CONSTRUCTION OFFICIAL
- Employer
- Mount Laurel Township
- Examination
- PM5005C
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-014 6-15-22 EG.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundKevin Bagnell appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services which found that he lacked the required license for the promotional examination for Assistant Construction Official (PM5005C), Mount Laurel.
The subject promotional examination announcement was issued with a closing date of December 21, 2021 and was open to employees in the competitive division who had an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the closing date in any competitive title and met the announced requirement of possession of a current and valid Construction Official's license issued by the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, and possession of the appropriate sub code official license and, will be required to possess a technical license HHS as a Building Inspector. The appellant was found to be ineligible for failure to indicate required license or registration. As the appellant was the sole applicant, the examination was cancelled on April 29, 2022.
With his application, the appellant indicated that he possessed the required licenses. However, he only submitted a copy of his driver’s license. On appeal, the appellant submitted a copy of a valid license issued February 1, 2022, two months after the closing date. Nonetheless, the appointing authority verifies that the appellant’s license has always been active, and he renewed it on time, and requests that the appellant be admitted to the examination.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive examination announcement by the closing date.
AnalysisThe announcement for the subject examination noted that applicants must upload a copy of the certificate with the application or be found to be ineligible. After receiving his Notification of Ineligibility, he filed an appeal and provided a copy of the required license. However, this license was issued two months after the closing date. Nevertheless, the appointing authority verified that appellant’s license has always been active, and he renewed it on time. Accordingly, the appellant should be admitted to the examination. For any future positions in which he might be interested, the appellant is cautioned that he should complete his application and provide all requested information.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, the examination cancellation be rescinded, and the appellant be admitted to the examination for Assistant Construction Official (PM5005C), Mount Laurel.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.