NJ Civil Service Navigator

Robert Minkler Jr., CSC Docket No. 2022-2911

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of August 3, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-2911: examination scoring or administration, granted. Robert Minkler Jr., appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services denying his request for a make-up examination for Deputy Fire Chief (PM1791A), Woodbridge

Commission decisions · Meeting of August 3, 2022

Robert Minkler Jr., appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services denying his request for a make-up examination for Deputy Fire Chief (PM1791A), Woodbridge.

Matter
Examination scoring or administration
Decided
August 3, 2022, item B-17
Outcome
Granted
Title
DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF
Employer
Woodbridge Township
Examination
PM1791A
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-017 8-3-22 TAMUG.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundRobert Minkler Jr., appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) denying his request for a make-up examination for Deputy Fire Chief (PM1791A), Woodbridge.

The appellant was scheduled to take the oral portion of the subject examination on May 7, 2022. On April 20, 2022, the appellant sent a request to take a make-up examination stating that his daughter’s First Holy Communion ceremony was scheduled by the church for that date. He states that his presence was required and it could not be rescheduled. Agency Services denied this request as it did not meet the criteria listed in N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.9. On appeal, the appellant provides documentation of the event. It is noted that this examination is competitive with three other eligible candidates, and the results are not yet available.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.9(b) provides, in pertinent part, that for professional level engineering, police, fire, correction officer, sheriff’s officer, juvenile detention officer and other public safety promotional examinations, make-ups may be authorized only in cases of:

1. Debilitating injury or illness requiring an extended convalescent period, provided the candidate submits a doctor’s certification containing a diagnosis and a statement clearly showing that the candidate’s physical condition precluded his or her participation in the examination;

Analysis2. Death in the candidate’s immediate family as evidenced by a copy of the death certificate;

3. A candidate’s wedding which cannot be reasonably changed as evidenced by relevant documentation;

4. When required for certain persons returning from military service (see N.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.6A); or

5. Error by the Civil Service Commission or appointing authority.

The record establishes that the appellant was scheduled to take the oral portion of the examination on May 7, 2022, and did not do so. Since it was the appellant’s daughter’s First Holy Communion ceremony, the appellant could not have reasonably had the date changed. While the circumstances presented by the appellant do not technically meet the stringent criteria for public safety make-up exams, it is appropriate to relax the governing provision on equitable grounds. Thus, the appellant should be provided with a make-up examination.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, and the appellant be provided with a make-up examination for the oral portion of the examination.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.