Teria Keith, CSC Docket No. 2022-3172
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of October 12, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-3172: examination eligibility, denied. Teria Keith appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination
Commission decisions · Meeting of October 12, 2022
Teria Keith appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination for Employment Specialist (C0386D), Atlantic County.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- October 12, 2022, item B-18
- Outcome
- Denied
- Title
- EMPLOYMENT SPECIALIST
- Employer
- Atlantic County
- Examination
- C0386D
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-018 10-12-22 ED.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundTeria Keith appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination for Employment Specialist (C0386D), Atlantic County.
The subject examination had a closing date of April 21, 2022 and was open to residents of Atlantic County who met the announced requirements. These requirements included, in pertinent part, graduation from an accredited college or university with a Bachelor’s degree, and one year of experience in assessing education and training needs and providing referrals for work experience and training services or in providing manpower development and training, job placement, education or vocational counseling, or a combination thereof. The appellant was found to be ineligible based on a lack of experience. There were two candidates on the eligible list who have been appointed.
On her application, the appellant indicated possession of a Bachelor’s degree, and she listed the following positions on her application and resume: Human Services Specialist 2; Human Services Specialist 1; Substitute Teacher (part-time, 30 hours per week); HEA Clerk; Clerk (Intake Worker); and, Youth Advocate (part- time, 25 hours per week). None of this experience was accepted, and the appellant was found to be lacking one year of experience.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal to the Civil Service Commission, the appellant argues that she is a provisional appointee in the subject title. Official records indicate that the appellant is serving as a Human Services Specialist 2.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive examination announcement by the closing date.
AnalysisA review of the appellant’s duties indicates that the responsibilities set forth in the announcement are not the primary focus of any of the appellant’s positions. Specifically, the appellant did not provide manpower development and training, place clients in jobs, provide education, or provide vocational counseling. In order for experience to be applicable, it must have as its primary focus full-time responsibilities in the areas required in the announcement. See In the Matter of Bashkim Vlashi (MSB, decided June 9, 2004). The appellant’s experience as a Human Services Specialist 1 and 2 involved primarily interviewing clients regarding finances. None of the appellant’s positions have the announced experience requirement as the primary focus. The appellant provided no details regarding her provisional position, and official records do not confirm that she was provisionally appointed to the subject title.
An independent review of all material presented indicates that the decision of Agency Services that the appellant did not meet the announced requirements for eligibility by the closing date is amply supported by the record. The appellant provides no basis to disturb this decision. Thus, the appellant has failed to support her burden of proof in this matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be denied.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
Decisions this one cites
- In the Matter of Bashkim Vlashi (June 9, 2004)
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.