Scott Kurz, CSC Docket No. 2022-3221
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of October 12, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-3221: examination eligibility, granted. Scott Kurz appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum experience requirements for the open-competitive examination for
Commission decisions · Meeting of October 12, 2022
Scott Kurz appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum experience requirements for the open-competitive examination for Mechanic Diesel (M0314D), West Milford.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- October 12, 2022, item B-20
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- MECHANIC DIESEL
- Employer
- West Milford Township
- Examination
- M0314D
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-020 10-12-22 EG.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundScott Kurz appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum experience requirements for the open- competitive examination for Mechanic Diesel (M0314D), West Milford.
The subject open-competitive examination was announced with a March 21, 2022 closing date, and was open to residents of West Milford and Passaic County who meet the announced requirements. These requirements included successful completion of one year of training in diesel engine repair at an accredited community college or vocational school, and two years of experience in the installation, maintenance, and repair of diesel engines. There were two candidates on the eligible list, which was certified once, and both have been appointed.
On his application, the appellant indicated that he completed a program in Automotive/Diesel & Industrial Technology from Universal Technical Institute. He listed one position, provisional Mechanic Diesel, from May 2021 to the March 2022 closing date. As he had not indicated working with diesel engines in this position, he was found to be lacking two years of experience.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant argues that he held a previous position with Raymond of New Jersey, a forklift rental and sales company, for 13 years where he worked on diesel industrial material handling equipment.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive examination announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) provides that an application may only be amended prior to the announced closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) may relax a rule for good cause in particular situations, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisInitially, the appellant was correctly denied admittance to the subject examination since he failed to indicate two years of qualifying experience on his application. For any future positions in which he might be interested, the appellant is cautioned that he should complete his application and provide all requested information. While the appellant failed to follow basic instructions in filling out his application, the prior certification was exhausted as both eligibles were appointed, the appellant is still serving as a provisional appointee, and he has indicated that he possessed applicable experience in a prior position that was not originally indicated on his application and which meets the announced requirement. Based on the particular circumstances presented, good cause has been established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) to accept the appellant’s amended experience and admit him to the examination for prospective appointment consideration.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.