Robert Wenteler Jr., CSC Docket No. 2022-334
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of October 6, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2022-334: examination eligibility, granted. Robert Wenteler, Jr., appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open competitive exam
Commission decisions · Meeting of October 6, 2021
Robert Wenteler, Jr., appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open competitive examination for Road Inspector (C0021C), Ocean County.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- October 6, 2021, item B-17
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- ROAD INSPECTOR
- Employer
- Ocean County
- Examination
- C0021C
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-017 10-06-21 EG.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundRobert Wenteler Jr. appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination for Road Inspector (C0021C), Ocean County.
The subject examination had a closing date of January 21, 2021 and was open to residents of Ocean County who met the announced requirement of one year of experience in road construction and maintenance work. The appellant was found to be ineligible based on a lack of experience. There is one candidate on the eligible list, but no appointments have yet been made.
On his application, the appellant listed five positions: provisional in the subject title from November 2020 to the January 2021 closing date; Owner of an electric company; Partner/Project Manager of Daniel Mount Electric; Project Manager/ Estimator/ JW with Midcoast Electric, and Journeyman/ Foreman/ Instructor with IBEW LU 400. The appellant was credited with three months for his provisional position, and was found to be lacking nine months of required experience.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant states that has over twenty two years of experience in “industrial electrical construction.” He provides a list of duties for some of his positions and adds a position as Adjunct Professor.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive examination announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) provides that an application may only be amended prior to the announced closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission may relax a rule for good cause in particular situations, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisInitially, the appellant was correctly found ineligible for the subject examination. He was credited with three months of experience for his provisional position. However, the remainder of his positions were inapplicable as they did not have road construction and maintenance work as the primary focus. Rather, his prior positions were in electrical work. Nonetheless, the eligible list is incomplete, the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the title under test, and he has accrued at least an additional nine months of experience since the January 2021 closing date. Based on the circumstances presented, good cause has been established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) to accept the appellant’s additional provisional experience beyond the closing date and admit him to the examination for prospective appointment only.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.